I would choose options (A) providing facts and (D) using deductive reasoning. Since the deductive reasoning is based on premises (providing fact would be the action needed) for its operation. When we reason deductively, we use known facts to arrive at logical conclusions that we know are true.
Answer:
The mantle is approximatly 2,900 km thick and it can get to be extreemly hot!
Explanation:
Answer:
u sef this question is too long abeg me I no know me I no fear do this thing
Answer:One paradox we can see in "The Birthmark" is when Georgiana states that she is willing to do anything to get rid of the birthmark even if it is a dangerous thing, as she claims the danger is not a threat to her life, but danger is a threat to anything.
Explanation: Danger is defined as the possibility of suffering harm or injury.
Answer:
snows, freeze
Explanation:
Every time it <u>snows</u>, our water pipes <u>freeze</u>.
-> The last one does not make sense (it are snowing, pipes is freezing)
-> The second one is a bit better, but "are freezing" is present tense, while is snowing is also present tense, the sentence itself is talking about the past, hence why "snows" fits better
Have a nice day!
I hope this is what you are looking for, but if not - comment! I will edit and update my answer accordingly. (ノ^∇^)
- Heather