This constitutional Amendment directly led to the first African American elected to the U.S. Senatea.

Whats the historical and dramatic role of the chorus in ancient greek drama

TiliK225 [7]

The chorus fights for the benefit of the entire community and what the choir always says has an argument, just like the replicas of others characters. Another important part of the choir is to introduce us to the mythical story that tragedy relies on, which is very important to us today because almost every surviving tragedy is based on some mythical story. It is not necessarily a mythical story, but also some real historical event. In this case, the chorus provides us with the necessary information and context without which our understanding of the tragedies would be greatly impeded.

Explanation:

If the emphasis was on actors, acting as in a later tragedy, the choir played a purely supporting, supporting role. Sometimes a choir of 15 people stood in three rows of five people each, that is, in five kinds.
Comedy choirs often had an even number and had a different schedule, depending on the setting. The choir, sorted by type, enters the stage singing an intro song, and was eventually answered by the exit song with which the action ended. After the opening song, the choir sang stasimon, standing songs sung by the choir after taking their place on stage and which at times had a digressive element.
In most cases, the choirist came in front of the choir, which gave a musical background to the declamation, so in such a structure the choir displayed and interpreted its stage parties through declamation, singing and declamation.

Learn more on Ancient Greek drama on

brainly.com/question/913257

brainly.com/question/1191167

#learnwithBrainly

7 0

3 years ago

Grant’s policy to win the war was one of <br> what

makvit [3.9K]

Answer:

Grant's policy to win the war was one of <em>attrition</em>.

Attrition is a gradual reduction in work force without firing personnel, as when workers resign or retire and are not replaced. Or in other words, it is a reduction or decrease in numbers, size, or strength (can be used in <em>"ACW"</em> terms)

<h2>What was General Ulysses S. Grant's strategy to win the war? (American Civil War)</h2>

It's critical to keep in mind that Grant wasn't solely responsible for the overall plan he employed during the war's final year. Lincoln urged that Confederate forces be struck and that Confederate cities and logistics be disregarded in favor of striking the enemy where he was, as described in James McPherson's book Tried by War. Lincoln's insistence on this at the expense of actions that would have had a larger immediate impact on the Confederate ability to prolong the war contributed in part to the "butcher" label placed on Grant. Grant would have sent half of the Army of the Potomac below the James River in order to push on Petersburg in May 1864, which would have certainly resulted in a shorter conflict and far fewer losses. Grant had the most crystal-clear vision of everyone as to how the Union could and should win the war: deny the Confederacy the resources necessary for it to wage war. Making the Anaconda Plan work first and foremost means seizing control of all significant Confederate harbors in order to prevent the supply of weapons and equipment from Europe. (In his narrative, he frequently laments how he was unable to carry out the attack on Mobile that he had planned, first because to Banks' Red River campaign and subsequently as a result of the sluggish and uncooperative generals on the ground.)

As a department commander in the Mississippi Valley, Grant's largest grievance, incidentally, was with licensed trade that occurred between the Union and Confederacy. Lincoln's government actually let traders to cross the lines and buy cotton using gold coin, which the Confederates would employ to transport drugs and other contraband from the Union. This was because the North was in such dire need of raw cotton. Grant thought that the commerce had bolstered the rebellion while weakening Union war resolve by fostering corruption. (And he felt a great deal of personal humiliation about the whole situation because his own father was heavily involved in the cross-border commerce.) Grant supported stealing or destroying indigenous Southern industries in addition to blocking Confederate trade overseas. As a result, the main Confederate cities—New Orleans, Richmond, Nashville, and Charleston—were captured and held while lesser towns were destroyed. This naturally included agriculture, which is why he specifically instructed Sheridan to remove all livestock from the Shenandoah and why he authorized Sherman's march into Georgia. Finally, Grant thought that steady pressure from all Union troops acting together would be the best way to achieve this on all fronts. By 1863, Grant realized that the Confederacy's greatest strength was their ability to shift troops from one dangerous location to another because Union forces kept starting and stopping without applying constant pressure to the enemy. Grant was well aware of the manpower and logistical limitations of the Confederacy. He thought that by applying continued pressure to the rebel troops, they would be forced to retreat or capitulate in the face of considerably superior forces. Grant's initiatives, as we all know, had a mixed record of success and were not completely implemented. Lincoln and Stanton (especially Stanton) interfered quite a bit. Grant's feeling of urgency for quick action was not shared by the majority of other Union generals, allowing the Confederacy to continue temporarily moving forces to fulfill demands. However, when massive casualty lists failed to do so, it was the conquest of Confederate ports, the obliteration of Confederate industry and agriculture, and the ensuing collapse of the southern economy that eventually shattered the rebel will to fight. In that regard, Grant's plan was the best one—and it worked.

Learn more about Ulysses Grant:

brainly.com/question/21942516

brainly.com/question/12468430

4 0

2 years ago

Which religion originated where?

trapecia [35]

The Anabaptists originated from Zurich/Germany.

Huguenots are mainly from Northern France.

The Anglican only has a long and unbroken history with Great Britain and Ireland.

Calvinism is originally from Switzerland. It spread through England, Scotland, France, the Netherlands, various colonies of North America, and parts of Germany and central Europe while in parts of Germany and Scandinavia Lutheranism spread.

Presbyterian originated from Scotland. There is a big influence from John Calvin and the works of John Knox (He brought back important reformed teachings to Scotland).

4 0

3 years ago

Give me womens suffrage facts/statistics. giving brainly

vladimir1956 [14]

Answer:

-The first women’s rights convention took place in Seneca Falls, New York, on July 19-20, 1848.

-In 1869 the movement split over disagreements about the 15th Amendment, which granted voting rights to African American men but not women.

-In 1913 Alice Paul organized NAWSA’s first women’s suffrage parade in Washington, D.C. The police failed to provide the suffragists with adequate protection, and spectators attacked the marchers. Paul formed a rival suffrage organization, the National Woman’s Party, in 1916.

-In 1916 Jeannette Rankin, a Republican from Montana, became the first woman elected to the U.S. Congress.

-In 1917 the National Woman’s Party organized protests outside the White House to pressure President Woodrow Wilson to support women’s suffrage.

-Thirty-three suffragists picketing outside the White House on Nov. 10, 1917, were arrested and jailed. They were fed maggot-infested food, beaten and tortured.

-The Republican Party was viewed as more supportive of women’s suffrage than Democrats until 1916, when both parties publicly supported state suffrage.

-Some 10 million women voted in 1920, a turnout rate of 36%, compared to 68% for men. Women voter turnout rates have gradually increased and exceeded male turnout rates since 1980, when 61.9% of women voted compared to 61.5% of men.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

GDP Per Capita (in U.S. dollars) Country GDP per Capita United Arab Emirates $29,100 Kuwait $22,800 Iran $8,100 Jordan $4,800 Su

Anvisha [2.4K]

With the GDP per capita, this depends on the wealth and the population of a country. For somewhere such as the Arab Emirates, they have a small population, but a fair amount of wealth, so this then increases the GDP. The situation is similar with Kuwait. Iran has also been affected by War, meaning that some of the infrastructure will hav been destroyed, and that people would not be able to work and make money, which is then something that will have a direct impact on the GDP. With countries such as Jordan and Sudan, As far as I'm aware, they are relatively poor countries with a high population, meaning that the GDP will be lower and split between more people,therefore, meaning that it will be low. With regards to A). Iran is a country that has definitely been affected by this, following the war. B) A large majority of the countries that have been mentioned are also predominately desert, so where there is not people that are making money, this is something that is then not contributing to the GDP. Countries such as Kuwait and UAE also have large oil reserves, and this is something that can contribute to wealth hugely, and the smaller the population, the less people the GDP has to be spread between, and therefore, this increases it. With environmental disasters, these can have a huge impact, and the amount of money that is being made is also greatly reduced, and the expenditure is also increased, which is also something that can decrease the GDP. Hope this helps you!

6 0

3 years ago

Read 2 more answers