Explain the difference between the virginia plan and the new jersey plan how were these deference resolved

1 answer:

3 0

The virginia plan stated that representation in the legislative branch for each state was based on population. the new Jersey plan stated that every state would have equal say in matters no matter the population. the great compromise was created saying that every state had a number of representatives based on the states population in the House of Representatives but every state also has 2 senators and has equal say in matters

You might be interested in

Pros and cons of the erie canal

GarryVolchara [31]

1- Pros of Erie Canal:
- Facilitated the migration to the Northwest great farm land
- Contributed in the revolution of transportation
- NYC harbor became the most important port in North America

2- Cons of the Erie canal:
- The south became isolated as the north was able to get the crops from the NW
- Expensive
- Did not help in the creation of the canal revolution that was predicted by Clinton

6 0

3 years ago

Describe the major political and economic developments of the period, including the death of the federalist party, the american

Sveta_85 [38]

I took off to japan oh man gahhh zammmm

5 0

3 years ago

In what year did texas join the confederacy?

sammy [17]

Answer:

1861

Explanation:

Texas joined the Confederacy in 1861. 

7 0

2 years ago

Using what you have learned, write one to two paragraphs comparing and contrasting the rise of the nation-state in Germany and J

Verizon [17]

For Germany, the nation-state had its antecedents with Franco -Prussian war in the late 1800s and Japan in the Russia-Japanese war that lead to creating the modern nation-state. A clear example of similarities between this two models is found in that Japan set its constitution according to the German constitution. Furthermore: the public educational system in Japan also had many similarities with the German public educational system.

Nationalism was key for this purpose: it helped consolidate power for Germany and Japan as recently formed modern states, and as a result, both states became international actors posing changes and threats in the politic and economic relations of the region and eventually in the world.

Similarities:

In the case of Germany and Japan, it helped unite people with the common language and cultural background. It created a deep sense of belonging among them. Before the rise of this nation-states for the case of both, there was already a role in politics and regional- foreign trade but it wasn't until they consolidated at states that it became also a power over the region. (Germany as a fully emerged power in Europe and Japan in Asia).

Differences:

Japan had been in a isolation for a very long time under a whole different cultural system (the Shogun) and with the emergence of the nationalism under the rule of Emperor Meiji it started to fully engage in the foreign trade that also eventually paved the way for the creation of a powerful army. (Without Japanese nationalism it would have been hard to imagine the onward expansion and intervention abroad).

3 0

3 years ago

(MC)The Open Door Policy resulted from which of these factors?

Viefleur [7K]

<h2>Answer:</h2>

In history its happen ordinarily In the eighteenth century the British forced China to Open their business sectors through narco-dealing opium from India. In the nineteenth century the US constrained Japan to Open its deliberate disengagement arrangement to US shippers and stock under risk of war.

For the most part the Open Door Policy is constrained by Governments who need their well off Individuals and Corporations to work inside a nation in a Capitalistic way. For the most part picking up control of a nations common assets and mean of creation.

4 0

3 years ago