Answer:
C) relaxed and alert at the same time
Hope this helps! 'v'
Answer:
2. (i) demand-side; (ii) both; (iii) supply-side; (iv) supply-side; (v) both
Explanation:
a. $1,000 per person tax reduction ⇒ focus on aggregate demand (more money for consumers to spend)
b. a 5% reduction in all tax rates ⇒ focus on both aggregate demand and supply (more money for consumers and suppliers)
c. Pell Grants, which are government subsidies for college education ⇒ focus on aggregate supply (more money for suppliers of college education)
d. government-sponsored prizes for new scientific discoveries ⇒ focus on aggregate supply (more money for suppliers of new scientific discoveries)
e. an increase in unemployment compensation ⇒ focus on both aggregate demand and supply (more money for consumers resulting in higher prices and lower output)
Answer:
Gross profit $39,000
Explanation:
X company
Income statement ( parochial)
For the year ended, June 30 20YY
Sales revenue $104,000
Less: cost of goods sold $65,000
Gross profit $39,000
In that case, we do not use Income tax expense, Operating expenses, Deferred revenues, Non-operating revenues because those will be needed when we will calculate the net income.
Answer: No.
Explanation:
This is a Perfectly Competitive market and that means that you are a price taker who maximises output at a point where Marginal Revenue equals Marginal Cost ( MR = MC). As costs have gone up, it simply means that for the conditions to be satisfied, you need to produce less at the factory in Connecticut.
That does not mean that you have to produce more at the Massachusetts plant because it is already producing at capacity and increasing the marginal cost would violate the MR=MC rule as you have no control over the price so you cannot change Marginal Revenue. It is therefore better to keep the production level at the Massachusetts plant unchanged.
234 with twelve chickens in a row of the other one
