Answer:
What would be the expected result of the experiment?
For the drawing of the map part, the scientific will find that effectively, a very large number of volcanoes are located near the meeting points of tectonic plates. The volcanoes that aren't now at the edge of the plate were most probably at the moment of their formation, and were moved away by the movement of the plate.
But I doubt the scientist would be able to identify many new volcanoes, because the creation of a volcano isn't something happening overnight.
How would you interpret the results if the scientist observes no new volcanic activity?
I would say that does NOT invalidate the theory because the observation period is extremely short. 10 years is an insignificant amount of time geologically speaking... the study would have to be conducted over at least 1,000 years to maybe have some results at all. Just imagine how many volcanoes there would be if a new one was created every 10 years along the side of a tectonic plate.
Explanation:
Where possible, we can switch to renewable sources of energy (such as solar and wind energy) to power our homes and buildings, thus emitting far less heat-trapping gases into the atmosphere.
Clean or green energy helps in releasing lesser air pollution and lesser carbon dioxide. That contributes in lowing down global warming and subsequent disasters like tsunami because of glacier melting , more unexpected climate changes like unexpected long-period storms, flood, typhoons, etc.
Hope this would help.
Answer:
Explanation:
Cl = 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p5
Al = 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p1
Fe2+ = 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6 4s2 3d4
S2- = 1s2 2s2 2p6 3s2 3p6
Diamagnetic materials are repelled by a magnetic field; an applied magnetic field creates an induced magnetic field in them in the opposite direction, causing a repulsive force. If all electrons in the particle are paired, then the substance made of this particle is diamagnetic.
S2- is diamagnetic because of its paired electrons in the outermost shell.
