Answer:
A. Anarchy => Constitutional => Authoritarian
Explanation:
Anarchy is can be referred to as a state where there is no real government system to enact laws that guides against the acts and behavior of the people in the society. There is practically no government system in place to serve as authorities nor law in such society. Everyone does as they like. This is the least power system of government.
Constitutional system of government consists of constituted authorities who rule and govern the affairs of a society as guided by enacted law. In this system of government is mostly elected democratically and the level of powers the elected authorities can wield is restricted and limited by the given constitution and law. This system of government is more powerful than that of Anarchy.
Authoritarian system of government is the most power of all. This system of government have authorities who exercise unrestricted enormous power in making decisions and ruling the society and the people.
Answer: try different activities to find something you enjoy more
Explanation: the question doesn’t directly say that it has to be jogging it only says “physically active” rather than “ I have to go jogging every single day.” The idea of having a alarm doesn’t really do anything, anybody can push snooze on a alarm, but finding a runner activity that keeps somebody active and that somebody will enjoy will be better.
There are two arguments that you could use in favor of the Proclamation of 1763. First, you could say that this was a moral law. By issuing this proclamation, the British government was protecting the Native Americans from having their lands taken from them by rapacious settlers. This was a good thing for the government to do. Second, you could say that this law made good sense economically. The British government did not want to have to spend a lot of money putting soldiers out beyond the Appalachians to protect the settlers from Indians. Therefore, it made sense for the government to issue this proclamation.
The major argument against the proclamation is that it infringed on the rights of the American colonists. Many colonists believed they had the right to live on whatever “unoccupied” land they wanted. It was wrong of the British government to limit their freedom in this way.
Answer:
The feudal system in China was structurally similar to ones that followed, such as pre-imperial Macedon, Europe, and Japan. At the beginning of the Zhou Dynasty's rule, the Duke of Zhou, a regent to the king, held a lot of power, and the king rewarded the loyalty of nobles and generals with large pieces of land.
Explanation:
Pls vote my answer as brainliest