1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
tiny-mole [99]
3 years ago
12

A vehicle is capable of causing extensive property damage, injury, and death. You should operate your vehicle with extreme cauti

on, because it is like handling __________.
1. your dog
2. a loaded gun
3. a toy
4. none of the above
Social Studies
2 answers:
Alisiya [41]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

<em><u>2. A loaded gun</u></em>

Explanation:

Commercial vehicle is the vehicle that is used to transport goods and people for exchange of payment. There are various types of commercial vehicles and each has its own risk of injuries and accidents. Smaller vehicles are more vulnerable near the commercial vehicles.

Commercial vehicles weigh abut 3,500 pounds on average such a vehicle can cause lot of damage. There braking distance is also more than a passenger vehicle and it can cause collisions if the car suddenly stops in front of a truck. Trucks also have blind spots on all sides and if a car is driving in any of these zones it is invisible to the truck driver and can cause accidents. Due to all these reasons we can say that it is just like a loaded gun.

Vitek1552 [10]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

correct answer is 2. a loaded gun

Explanation:

solution

as gun is very danger equipment for you it can be use for kill any body

so according to traffic rule we can not carry loaded gun

but we can carry dog and toy etc which is not harmful or cause for anyone death

and by mistake also loaded gun may create disaster problem

so here correct option is 2. a loaded gun

You might be interested in
In the First Indian War of Independence, what was the main reason the British were able to defeat the Indians?
natka813 [3]

There are a good number of reasons why the British were able to do so, and in fact rule over India effectively for over a century.

<span><span>Disunity among Indian princely states. India was more a collection of warring princely states, at loggerheads with each other. The British sucessfully used this to play off one state against another. Add to it there was no dearth of people willing to betray the kingdom for a few pieces of silver. Robert Clive succeeded at Plassey, because Mir Jaffar was willing to betray his master Siraj-Ud-Daulah in lie of being the Nawab. Mir Jaffar himself was betrayed by Mir Qasim later on.Tipu Sultan one of the most redoubtable fighters against the British rule, was finally defeated, as the Marathas, King of Mysore, Nizam of Hyderabad all joined hands with the British.</span><span>Superiority over other colonial powers. The other colonial powers in India competing for the share of resources were France,Portugal,Denmark, Holland. Of the 4, Denmark and Holland could never really be serious competitors to the British, they had their own trading posts, scattered around, but were never a serious threat. Portugal focussed primarily on the Western coast, Goa, parts of Kerala, Karnataka, and this left the British with vast swathes of unoccupied territory. That left France as the major contender to Britian in the race for colonialism. The British Army was more well equipped, more professional, more disciplined compared to the French army, suffering from indiscipline and corruption. This made the British win key battles all over the East Coast, as they effectively grabbed control.</span><span>Doctrine of Lapse. One of the most effective tactics, the British used to take over most of India. Instead of waging an all out war against some of the princely states, they signed a treaty with them, where in if the ruling king died without a heir, the East India company could take over that. And that is how Satara became one of the first states to end up under British rule. And that was also the main reason for the conflict in Jhansi.</span><span>Subsidiary alliance was also an effective instrument. According to this alliance, the kingdom which signs the treaty will have to maintain the following rules:<span>The British agreed to maintain a permanent and fixed subsidiary force within the territory of their ally.In return, they didn't take money but took over a part of the territory of the ally.A British officer called "resident" was placed at the court of the ruler.{he could interfere in the internal matters of the kingdom}The ally could not maintain any relation with any other ruler without the approval of the British.{so,when the rulers wanted to revolt against the British they are alone.}</span>The Indian rulers felt a false sense of security but in reality they were losing their independence. On the other hand the Britishers maintained large forces at the expenses of the Indian rulers and also increase their area of influence. Some states brought under control through this policy are Hyderabad, Tanjore, Awadh, etc.</span></span>

At the end of it all, the British had the advantage of better manpower, were militarily more powerful and stronger, and add to it they had some very canny strategists too. And the disunity among Indian princely states, their constant warring with each other, just added to the advantage.

6 0
2 years ago
People who speak two different languages are ______ able to inhibit their attention to irrelevant information than people who sp
natima [27]

Answer: <u>Bilingual people, bilingual advantage</u>

Explanation:

Bilingual people are those individual who have ability to speak two languages with fluency.They can communicate in two languages which they might have learned or is natively present in them.

Bilingual advantage is the benefits received by a person who speaks two different languages.They develop learning and communicating ability more as compared with single-language speaking person.It also provides more number of opportunities, perspective and attention to the individual.

5 0
2 years ago
Cuantos dictadores han habido en el ecuador
Likurg_2 [28]

Answer:

Guillermo Alberto Santiago Lasso Mendoza (pronunciación en español: [ɡiˈʝeɾmo ˈlaso]; nacido el 16 de noviembre de 1955) es un empresario, banquero, escritor y político ecuatoriano que ocupa el puesto 47 y actual presidente de Ecuador desde el 24 de mayo de 2021.

Por favor, márcame como Brainliest

3 0
2 years ago
Governments were created to manage the activities of _____.
GenaCL600 [577]
The answer will be people!
8 0
3 years ago
Family violence has been associated with families who canno
loris [4]
Hey there,
The answer is communicate well

Hope this helps :))

~Top
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Beethoven is to ______________ as van gogh is to ______________.
    7·2 answers
  • Some of the reasons people chose to head west were
    13·1 answer
  • Imagine what you might find in a place that has been empty for four hundred years! List ten things that you think you might find
    8·1 answer
  • What is the relationship between pleasant and unpleasant affects?
    7·1 answer
  • Why should historians question Edward Ennis?
    13·1 answer
  • Is it true Copernicus and Galileo believed that the Earth was at the center of the universe.
    10·2 answers
  • I'm tall when i'm young and i'm short when i'm old. What am I?<br>​
    5·2 answers
  • Identify each statement as true of Brazil, or Japan. Brazil The technocratic model of childbirth is dominant. Press Space to ope
    9·1 answer
  • I need help with this I am trying to help my grandson but this is where i am stuck at.
    11·1 answer
  • What was George Washington trying to say about the american government in this proclamation
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!