Answer:
Civil-military cooperation centers (CMOCs).
Explanation:
During humanitarian missions or in the war, a military force trying to stabilize the situation usually forms a meeting place for military and non-military (civil) groups. This place is used as a humanitarian relief and reconstruction activities, or can even serve as an information center regarding civilian activities in the town or region. It can also be used as a place where a temporary government is formed, which would be in function until the civilian governance returns to normal.
CMOCs were used in the Iraqi War (2003).
Answer:
sensory; perception
Explanation:
Carlos was just touched on his cheek, which is a Sensation. Which refers to when a certain stimuli triggers one of the senses that sends sensory information to the brain. In order for Carlos to know if he was kissed or slapped, Carlos needs a perception. Perception refers to how the brain organizes, identifies, and interprets sensory information that is received. This would allow Carlos to come to a conclusion as to what exactly touched his cheek.
<u><em>Carnitas are a Mexican dish that in a real sense means "little meats" in Spanish. Carnitas are made by stewing pork in one or the other oil or fat until the meat is delicate. The hotness is expanded once the pork has arrived at the ideal delicacy and the outside of the pig starts to fresh. At this stage, the collagen in the meat has separated adequately to permit it to be pulled separated manually or fork. The whole interaction requires three to four hours, and the outcome is exceptionally delicate and succulent pork, which can be utilized as a fixing in tamales, tacos, and burritos.</em></u>
Are you satisfied for this answer? Took me about 8 minutes.
Hope this helped! :^)
The correct answer is south-southwest
Therefore, the wind direction at Chicago, in northeast Illinois, at map time was generally from the <u>south-southwest.</u>
Answer: 4. Regents of the University of California v. Bakke
Explanation:
In June 1978, the Supreme Court declared that affirmative action was legal insofar as racial quotas were not used. The case was brought by a white California man, Allan Bakke who said he had suffered reverse racism as he had higher scores than minority group members but was refused admission because of a University rule that reserved 16% of admission slots for minority groups. The Supreme Court ordered the University to admit Bakkie as using quotas was unconstitutional but also held that race can be used as a valid factor in admissions decisions.
This showed that affirmative action was legal but subject to scrutiny.
