Explanation:
I'm also looking for the question plz help
The two authors show that if the characters had made different decisions, they would not have suffered the drastic consequences.
<h3>Who is Oedipus and Perseus:</h3>
- Perseus was a Greek hero, son of Zeus, and had great strength.
- These characteristics made him a very arrogant man.
- He decided to refuse the help of other heroes to fight a monster, which caused him to suffer terrible consequences.
- Oedipus was a prince.
- He received a prophecy that he would kill his father.
- He decides to run away from home to prevent this prophecy from happening.
- This escape, makes him find his biological father and ends up killing him without knowing it, which causes terrible consequences.
Both authors reinforce the decision made by the characters. Those decisions made fate act for them to take negative actions and establish horrible consequences.
More information about Oedipus at the link:
brainly.com/question/13613922
Answer:
The logical prediction that can be made from this passage is General Zaroff will return and will keep hunting Rainsford
Explanation:
"The most dangerous game" by Richard Connell tells the story of how a hunter who has fun making his prey suffer, becomes the prey himself, Then General Zaroff as any other hunter does not want the game to end so fast, as he sees that Rainsford is there as an easy prey he prefers to go back and make the game a bit longer.
You can write about the time you overcame having an idea for this project ( but when we moved to a different state and I had to go to a new school)
Euthanasia is where a person is being deliberately killed to end their life of suffering. it is not murder. and is done with the consent of either the patient or their family.
im notsure what the other word means :(