1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
My name is Ann [436]
3 years ago
6

How do you think news reporters' comments and coverage of this event is influencing viewers?How do you think this inauguration w

ill encourage others to learn about the political process?
THE INAUGURATION EVENT
History
1 answer:
vagabundo [1.1K]3 years ago
3 0

Answer:

:)

Explanation:

I think that if reporters comment thing that are simply no true like

"oh Donald Trump should be inaugurated right now not Joe Biden"

Then there are going to be people who will agree with them with out fact checking anything. Then I think there would be people who would fact check everything to make sure they are correct (as they should). I think people (people who rely on facts) would look up on multiple sources to get to the bottom of things so they can call out people who are wrong.

You might be interested in
Which of the ancient civilizations developed an empire that controlled the most land?
Mashcka [7]
<span>Out of the ancient civilizations the empire which controlled the most land was the Persian Empire. It was under the leadership of Alexander the Great that the Persian Empire was finally conquered. The Empire was connected by a vast series of roads, most famous of which was the Royal Road, and they controlled a fleet of many ships used to conquer surrounding lands.</span>
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might irene emerson have rejected dred scotts offer to purchase his family and their freedom
notka56 [123]

Answer:

ONIONS

Explanation:

In its 1857 decision that stunned the nation, the United States Supreme Court upheld slavery in United States territories, denied the legality of black citizenship in America, and declared the Missouri Compromise to be unconstitutional. All of this was the result of an April 1846 action when Dred Scott innocently made his mark with an "X," signing his petition in a pro forma freedom suit, initiated under Missouri law, to sue for freedom in the St. Louis Circuit Court. Desiring freedom, his case instead became the lightning rod for sectional bitterness and hostility that was only resolved by war.

image of Dred Scott

Dred Scott

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

"Dred Scott, a man of color, respectfully states. he is claimed as a slave."

(Petition to Sue for Freedom, 6 April 1846)

Initially, Scott's case for freedom was routine and relatively insignificant, like hundreds of others that passed through the St. Louis Circuit Court. The cases were allowed because a Missouri statute stated that any person, black or white, held in wrongful enslavement could sue for freedom. The petition that Dred Scott signed indicated the reasons he felt he was entitled to freedom. Scott's owner, Dr. John Emerson, was a United States Army surgeon who traveled to various military posts in the free state of Illinois and the free Wisconsin Territory. Dred Scott traveled with him and, therefore, resided in areas where slavery was outlawed. Because of Missouri's long-standing "once free, always free" judicial standard in determining freedom suits, slaves who were taken to such areas were freed-even if they returned to the slave state of Missouri. Once the bonds of slavery were broken, they did not reattach.

Dred Scott was born to slave parents in Virginia sometime around the turn of the nineteenth century. His parents may have been the property of Peter Blow, or Blow may have purchased Scott at a later date. The mystery of exact ownership is one that would follow Dred Scott, and later his family, throughout their lives as slaves. With few records extant, it is difficult to identify exactly when ownership of the family was transferred to various parties. By 1830, Peter Blow had settled his family of four sons and three daughters and his six slaves in St. Louis. This was after having moved from Virginia to Alabama, to attempt farming near Huntsville, and, when that failed, a move from Alabama to Missouri. In St. Louis, Peter Blow undertook the running of a boarding house, the Jefferson Hotel. Within a year, though, his wife Elizabeth died and on June 23, 1832, Peter Blow passed away.

image of front view of St. Louis

Front view of St. Louis

Credit: Missouri Historical Society

The Blow children remained in St. Louis after the deaths of their parents and became well established in the city's society through marriage to prominent families. Charlotte Taylor Blow married Joseph Charless, Jr., in November 1831; his father had established the first newspaper west of the Mississippi River and had been a leading opponent of slavery while editor. Charless, Jr., operated a wholesale drug and paint store, Charless & Company (later Charless, Blow, & Company when brothers-in-law Henry Taylor Blow and Taylor Blow became partners). Martha Ella Blow married attorney Charles Drake in 1835. Drake is better known in history for his role in the creation of Missouri's 1865 constitution. As a leader of the Radical Republican Party after the Civil War, he was determined to punish those considered Southern sympathizers; the constitution he helped author took away many of their rights, including enfranchisement. Peter Ethelrod Blow married Eugenie LaBeaume in 1833. She was from an old French banking family; her oldest brother was a wealthy businessman who, in partnership with Blow, formed Peter E. Blow & Company. She had two other brothers; one was the St. Louis County sheriff for a time in the 1840s, and one, Charles Edmund LaBeaume, was a St. Louis attorney who played an important role in Dred Scott's freedom suits. All of these St. Louis connections proved helpful to Dred Scott.

<h2>Hope this helps :)</h2>
5 0
3 years ago
What natural rights are listed in the declaration of independence
tatiyna

Answer:

Life, Liberty, And the pursuit of happiness

6 0
3 years ago
What evidence of the effects of colonization in the Americas can you see today?
blsea [12.9K]
Around the world today<span>, intractable conflict is found in many areas that were once Africa, the Balkans, Southeast Asia, the Middle East, South </span>America. <span>Imperialist policies promoted ethnic rivalry by favoring </span>one<span> group above the others, side's position, using different historical boundaries as </span>evidence <span>for their claims.</span>
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
You’re over 18 have been in the country for six years and I’ve learned English what’s your next step toward becoming a citizen
Aleksandr-060686 [28]

Answer:

Explanation:

Go to Immigration and Naturalization Service and have yourself be interviewed by them

3 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • Which of the following best describes the beginning of World War II?
    11·2 answers
  • Puspupusiya, al pagluuug ng pananampalataya.
    11·1 answer
  • Which of the following is accurate about the aftermath of the war?
    9·1 answer
  • The Spanish/American war In which ways were the Americans conducting themselves immorally?
    7·1 answer
  • . Explain why world system theorists often argue that multinational
    12·1 answer
  • Which words describe the composition of the inner planets (need three)
    13·1 answer
  • A map titled The Iberian Peninsula. Portugal, Spain, and France are labeled. Africa is below Spain. Portugal is to the left of S
    6·2 answers
  • Who first improved on the Persian political and legal systems established by Cyrus the Great?
    15·2 answers
  • Which empire is that ?
    8·1 answer
  • What three groups of islands make up the Caribbean islands
    7·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!