1829, having been passed by the supreme court, under the leadership of John Marshall who was a VERY big government man, in 1924.
However, the side he came down on in the Maysville Road veto was that the Maysville Road was totally local and therefore federal funds should not be used for local issues. Then again, he may have opposed the bill simply because Henry Clay supported it and those men hated each other.
So perhaps by his veto of the Maysville Road bill, he was saying he did not agree with Gibbons v Ogden but like I said, to my knowledge, there is no record on how he felt about it (but I am sure he had an opinion because the man had opinions about EVERYTHING
<u>The correct answers are:
</u>
<u>suspending habeas corpus during peacetime
</u>
<u> borrowing money for the government creating a national religion
</u>
<u> creating a law ex post facto
</u>
The privilege of habeas corpus will not be suspended, except when public security requires it in cases of rebellion or invasion.
Prosecution decrees and ex post facto laws will not be passed
The correct answers are A) Britain acquired the eastern Mississippi basin. B) The French threat to the colonies was removed. D) The British Empire grew substantially. H) Britain began to tax the colonies.
The options that were results of the French and Indian War were the following: Britain acquired the eastern Mississippi basin, the French threat to the colonies was removed, the British Empire grew substantially, Britain began to tax the colonies.
The French and British lived another episode in their long list of differences and confrontations during the French and Indian War, also known as the Seven Year's War. The reason for the dispute that time, territories in North America. The armed confrontation started in 1756 and ended in 1763 with the English victory.
