It began after the stock market crash of October 1929, which sent Wall Street into a panic and wiped out millions of investors. Over the next several years, consumer spending and investment dropped, causing steep declines in industrial output and employment as failing companies laid off workers.
Dynastic cycle (traditional Chinese: 朝代循環; simplified Chinese: 朝代循环; pinyin: Cháodài Xúnhuán) is an important political theory in the Chinese history. According to this theory, each dynasty in Chinese history, rises to a political, cultural, and economic peak and then, because of moral corruption, declines, loses the Mandate of Heaven, and falls, only to be replaced by a new dynasty. The cycle then repeats under a surface pattern of repetitive motifs.[1]
It sees a continuity in Chinese history from early times to the present by looking at the succession of empires or dynasties, implying that there is little basic development or change in social or economic structures.[2] John K. Fairbank expressed the doubts of many historians when he wrote that "the concept of the dynastic cycle... has been a major block to the understanding of the fundamental dynamics of Chinese history."[3]
Answer:
John Locke based his theories related to economics on a version of natural law, arguing that people have a natural right to claim unowned resources and land as private property, thereby transforming them into economic goods by mixing them with their labor.
Answer:
A=It showed that Japan was close to surrendering.
B=It showed that the US could not win the war without it.
C=It showed that Japan was willing to fight to the end.
D=It showed the US could easily defeat Japan.
Explanation:
A= यसले देखाएको छ कि जापान आत्मसमर्पणको नजिक थियो। B = यसले देखाएको छ कि अमेरिका बिना युद्ध जित्न सक्दैन। C = यसले देखाएको छ कि जापान अन्त सम्म लड्न इच्छुक थियो। D = यसले देखाएको छ कि अमेरिकाले जापानलाई सजिलै हराउन सक्छ।