Write the set of points from -6 to 0 but excluding -4 and 0 as a union of intervals
First we take the interval -6 to 0. In that -4 and 0 are excluded.
So we split the interval -6 to 0.
Start with -6 and go up to -4. -4 is excluded so we break at -4. Also we use parenthesis for -4.
Interval becomes [-6,-4) . It says -6 included but -4 excluded.
Next interval starts at -4 and ends at 0. -4 and 0 are excluded so we use parenthesis not square brackets
(-4,0)
Now we take union of both intervals
[-6,-4) U (-4,0) --- Interval from -6 to 0 but excluding -4 and 0
Answer:
By multiplying each ratio by the second number of the other ratio, you can determine if they are equivalent. Multiply both numbers in the first ratio by the second number of the second ratio. For example, if the ratios are 3:5 and 9:15, multiply 3 by 15 and 5 by 15 to get 45:75.
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
First and foremost, all quadratics have a domain of all real numbers (as long as we are not given only a portion of the graph, or one with endpoints. Our graph does not have endpoints, so it is assumed that the tails will continue to go down into negative infinity and at the same time, the x coordinates will keep growing as well.) Since our quadratic is upside down, it has a max. That means that none of the values on the graph will be above that point. All the values will be below that highest point (the highest y-value). Y-values indicate range, and since our highest y-value is at y = 2, then the range is
y ≤ 2
Answer:
The right answer is:
a.H0: μd = 0; H1: μd > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The claim that want to be tested is that the sales were significantly increased after the commercial, indicanting that the advertisement campaign was effective.
This claim is usually expressed in the alternative hypothesis as it has to have enough evidence to prove that it is true.
Then, the alternative hypothesis H1 should state that the difference (sales after - sales before) is higher than 0.
The null hypothesis would state that the difference is not significantly different from 0, or, in other words, that the sales are the same before and after and that the variation is due to pure chance.
Then, the null hypothesis H0 would state that the difference is equal to 0.
The right answer is:
a.H0: μd = 0; H1: μd > 0
Check the picture below.
let's recall that a straight-line has 180°, and that sum of all interior angles in a triangle is also 180°.
