1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Marta_Voda [28]
3 years ago
5

Although Grady assisted Georgia’s economic growth, what is he criticized for?

History
1 answer:
antoniya [11.8K]3 years ago
4 0

Henry W. Grady, born in Athens in 1850, Grady became well known for his great ability as a writer and debater. After leaving the University of Georgia, he studied literature and history at the University of Virginia in Charlottesville and later on persued a career in journalism. Throghout his life as a journalist, Grady managed several papers in the South and became an influential political figure in that with his arguments and easiness of conviction, he was able to push forward the nominations and candidacies of several of his fellow political members at the Atlanta Ring, a group of proindustry Democrats who believed firmly in the ideals of the New South. Grady firmly believed in the need to promote industrial investment from the North, a reinitiation of the Southern industries, a change in the trust between North and South to increase investment. When he returned to Atlanta, Grady dedicated himself to underlining the magnificence of Atlanta as a center over Macon, Athens and Augusta. Despite the favorable effects that Grady had to improve the economical growth of Georgia, but most importantly of Atlanta, he was highly critized by his peers and fellow Georgians for exposing the South with his ideas and policies to the control and subjugation of the North, selling the South to the North and inviting oppression on Souther farmers. He was also critized for attempting to show the North a more bening stand on the issue of freed slaves and slavery. Grady died on December of 1889.

You might be interested in
What contributed to the fall of the Ghana Empire? O Invaders destroyed important trade routes. O Natural resources ran out due t
Fynjy0 [20]

Answer:

Invaders destroyed important trade routes. Natural resources… ... important trade routes. Natural resources ran out due to overtrading. People changed as a result of cultural diffusion. The government favored certain groups over others. 2 ... Incognit-oh-no… Log in or create an ... 374 people helped. unlock.

Explanation:

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
If you will answer wil get the branliest. Which best explains how rivers affected the interaction between prehistoric groups? Th
marissa [1.9K]
I think B because people always want to be near water so they would have to share the river for cooking bathing and more 

3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did the economy of texas struggle when it became a republic after indinpendence
Amiraneli [1.4K]

Answer:

In the early days of exploration and settlement by the Spanish, Texas represented a vast, unsecured, and sparsely populated territory with little immediate economic or political value. Over almost three centuries from approximately 1519 (when Spanish explorers first came to Texas) to 1800, the Spanish established only a few, relatively small settlements in the territory. Spain's military authority over that time was limited and uneven, sometimes eclipsed by aggressive and powerful indigenous groups like the Apaches and Comanches.

Vast spaces and sparse settlement made any claim to the territory tenuous. In 1803, only three years after the French wrested the territory of Louisiana from weak Spanish control, they sold it to the United States. The new owners then claimed that the territory's southwestern border was the Rio Grande (known to Mexicans as the Rio Bravo).

This raised Spanish concern that the territory west of the Sabine River needed to be populated with Spanish subjects--"facts on the ground," as we say today. The limited progress made by the Spanish in populating the Texas territory by the first decade of the 1800s easily came undone during the early struggles for independence from Mexico (1811 to 1813). By the time of Mexico's ultimate independence in 1821 the Texas territory had even fewer persons of Spanish descent than at the turn of the century--probably fewer than 5,000.

During the first two decades of the nineteenth century the people of the territory remained quite poor, even by frontier standards. The territory was too vast and under-populated for significant wealth generating commerce to thrive. The population and the economy was largely sustained by the Spanish military, which had sent garrisons to defend the territory from encroaching Anglos and hostile natives.

Stephen F. Austin

After independence a period of relative tranquility settled over Texas as the new Mexican government focused on establishing a constitution, laws and state-level administration. The territory of Texas was joined with Coahuila to become the state of Coahuila y Tejas.

Meanwhile, immigration from the United States--mainly from Tennessee--continued to swell the Anglo population. The settlement founded by Moses Austin in 1820 and later managed by his son Stephen grew steadily. Stephen sought and won approval for a law under the newly independent Mexican government that promoted the development of settlements by granting large tracts of land to agents who recruited colonists to the territory. This was known as the empresario system, and the agents were called empresarios.

Approximately 30 or more six-year empresario contacts were awarded beginning in 1825, providing compensation to the empresarios for up to 9,000 immigrant families. The empresario contracts covered vast areas of Texas territory, effectively denying the state government the authority over disposition of these lands for the six-year period of the contracts. These empresario contracts represented the main legal mechanism by which property in the public domain was put into private hands.

Still, because they provided land to settlers at very low cost, and required that the individual acquirers inhabit and cultivate the land, they had a broad democratizing effect. Concentration of land ownership and land speculation--common in other parts of the frontier in the United States--was largely absent in Coahuila y Tejas.

The late 1820s and 1830s were characterized by growing political tension despite--and perhaps because of--the deepening economic development in the territory. The population of Texas in 1820 was about 7,000, not much greater than it was in the first years of the century. But, during the colonization period after Mexican independence from Spain (1821-1835) the population of Texas grew at a considerable rate, if admittedly from a very low base. The non-native population grew more than ten-fold from about 2,000 at the time of Mexican independence to an estimated 20,000 in 1831.

Population growth through immigration primarily from the United States seemed to accelerate in the early 1830s despite the considerable political turmoil caused by factional struggles over political control of the huge expanse of territory that constituted the state of Coahuila y Tejas.

By 1834 the Texas population (including slaves) was estimated at 24,700. Just two years later in 1836--the year of Texas independence from Mexico--the non-native population was estimated at about 38,470. Including the estimated 14,200 natives brought the total population to well over 50,000.

Many factors on both sides of the U.S.-Mexico border--then formed by the Sabine River which separates the states of Texas and Louisiana today--contributed to the considerable growth in the number of colonists from the United States. Still, it seems that the much lower cost of land in Texas than in frontier areas of the United States, combined with the formal land grant

Explanation:

3 0
4 years ago
Plz help!!!! Thanks a bunch:) Someone plzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz I have been waiting for so long. When i signed up it said within 10
Pani-rosa [81]
Actually, I would say there  is barely any  relations: some of the higher income areas are very democrat ( so the first one is a possible answer), but some other are republican. Some of the richest are republican too. So in the end, i'd say there is no apparent relationship, although if there is, then democrats tend to be richer( but just a bit- the problem is that most of Florida is republican, so it's hard to to tell.
3 0
3 years ago
Which night time attack by George Washington on the British resulted in helping to restore the continental army
irinina [24]
It was the famous crossing of the Delaware river that took place on Christmas eve
3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Heyyyyy peeeeppps help asap plzz :)
    5·1 answer
  • What was the difference between an indentured servant and a slave
    6·1 answer
  • How did bacons rebellion affect relations between colonists and Native Americans ?
    9·1 answer
  • How did the Civil war change what it means to be American ? <br><br>pleaz help !
    15·2 answers
  • What are some short facts about the English colonization
    5·1 answer
  • Summarize the causes of the French Revolution in 2-3 sentences.
    12·1 answer
  • What is the main difference between a federal government and a unitary government?
    12·1 answer
  • How did the kkk change during the 1920s​
    8·2 answers
  • Plzzz make a sentence with the word Colonialism<br> in it???
    5·2 answers
  • What was one result of the French and Indian war
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!