The experimental research has two key advantages over correlational studies.
1. The possibility of random assignment
2. Causal connections can be assumed.
<h3>
What benefit does experimental research have over correlational research?</h3>
Correlational studies merely examine the data that already exists, whereas experimental studies give the researcher the opportunity to influence the study's factors. Researchers can make inferences about how changes in one variable affect changes in another through the use of experimental investigations.
The factors in a correlation study are out of the control of the researcher or research team. The researcher merely measures the information she discovers in the outside world. She can then determine whether changes in one are related to changes in the other, or if the two variables are correlated. In such a study, experimenters gather existing data and use statistical methods to examine it, such as economic statistics from governments. The findings of correlation studies can lead to hypotheses that can be verified through a more focused experimental one.
To learn more about correlational research visit:
brainly.com/question/14375687
#SPJ4
E=16 pls brainliest me have a good day/night
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
Since the length of both legs of the right angle triangle are given, we would determine the hypotenuse, h by applying Pythagoras theorem which is expressed as
Hypotenuse² = one leg² + other leg²
Therefore,
h² = (3a)³ + (4a)³
h² = 27a³ + 64a³
h² = 91a³
Taking square root of both sides,
h = √91a³
The formula for determining the perimeter of a triangle is expressed as
Perimeter = a + b + c
a, b and c are the side length of the triangle. Therefore, the expression for the perimeter of the right angle triangle is
√91a³ + (3a)³ + (4a)³
= √91a³ + 91a³
Answer:
C Cos32
Step-by-step explanation:
