Powers which have not been explicitly granted by the Constitution
It would be "<span>Appointing judges can appear corrupt as the executive seeks those with similar ideology</span>" that supports this type of system, since this implies that it is unfair to have an executive such as a president appoint justices.
Answer:
to obtain rescue for the main body of the stranded imperial trans-antarctic expedition of 1914
<u>The answer is that a peace treaty was signed, but the settlers did not follow it.</u>
The British Government came to the conclusion that settlers and Indians should remain separate. On October 7, 1763, the Crown drafted the Royal Decree of 1763, through which he wanted to reorganize the North American territories
The officers drew a line of separation between the British colonies and the lands of the natives west of the Appalachian Mountains, creating an immense Indian Reservation that ranged from the Appalachians to the Mississippi River and from Florida to Newfoundland. By prohibiting settlers from entering Indian lands, the British government hoped to avoid new events such as the Pontiac Rebellion.
The effects of the Pontiac war were noted for a long time. Because the Decree recognized some indigenous rights over the lands they occupied, it became known as the Indian Bill of Rights.
<em>However, the Royal Decree of 1763 did not prevent the British from attempting to expand westward, so the Indians were forced to form new resistance movements. </em>The first began in 1767 after a meeting organized by the Shawnee.
You are correct. The answer is choice C. Nice work.
The articles of confederation focused on the states having more power than the central federal government. Many could argue that this allowed for the 13 states to effectively be their own country (more or less). So this led to many conflicts between the states and wasn't very effective in unifying those states together.
