Answer:
number 3 gurl or guy cause first how you gonna make it if you dont go materials
<u>Answer</u>:
Macbeth himself, Lady Macbeth and three witches are to be blamed for Macbeth’s downfall.
<u>Explanation</u>:
The three witches predicted that “Macbeth” will be the King of Scotland. Thereafter, Macbeth started becoming thirsty for power.
Macbeth was not a wise man and got convinced by his wife, after she called him a coward, to murder Duncan. Macbeth even killed Banquo who was his best friend. So, he is responsible for his acts.
He did all this only because he wanted the power of being a king. Though eventually he was skeptical about Duncan's murder, he got convinced by his wife to murder Duncan. Thus, both the witches and 'Lady Macbeth' are liable for his downfall.
Chekhov's use of the third-person limited point of view in "The Bet" allows describing the banker's self-contempt when the banker reads the lawyer's essay.
Answer: B
Explanation
In the story, “The Bet” Chekhov ended in a vague manner.
The story tells about a bet between a lawyer and the banker made.
The subject of the bet was whether death penalty or life sentence is merciful to an individual.
Those who read this story wish to know on the thoughts of the lawyer after he exits the prison but the feelings aren't revealed in detail but a glimpse of thoughts that run in the mind of the banker is shown.
Well, let's see what we've got here:
( 4⁻³ · 3⁴ · 4² ) / ( 3⁵ · 4⁻² ) .
The two simple rules of exponents that we're
going to use here are:
-- Two multiply two numbers with the same base,
add their exponents. Like (A³) · (A²) = A⁵ .
But the bases have to be the same.
-- A negative power just means it belongs in the
other section of a fraction.
A negative power on top means it belongs on the bottom.
A negative power on the bottom means it belongs on top.
Like A⁻² means 1/A² . And 1/B⁻³ means B³ .
That's all you need in order to clean up the big fraction
in the question. But in order to see where you can use
these rules, you need to re-arrange things first.
Original: ( 4⁻³ · 3⁴ · 4² ) / ( 3⁵ · 4⁻² )
Let's send the 4⁻³
to the bottom
where it belongs: ( -- 3⁴ · 4² ) / 4³ · ( 3⁵ · 4⁻² )
Not take that 4⁻² from
the bottom, and put it on
top, where it belongs: ( 4² · 3⁴ · 4² ) / 4³ · ( 3⁵ -- )
Multiply the 4²s on top: ( 4⁴ · 3⁴ ) / ( 4³ · 3⁵ )
Now let me break this up.
Not changing anything, just
writing it in a different way: ( 4⁴ / 4³ ) · ( 3⁴ / 3⁵ )
Look at the first fraction: 4⁴ / 4³ .
Divide top and bottom by 4³ , and it becomes just 4 .
Now look at the second fraction: 3⁴ / 3⁵ .
Divide top and bottom by 3⁴ , and it becomes just 1/3 .
So in the end, we're left with just 4 / 3 .
And THAT is exactly equal to the original big messy fraction
in the question. It has exactly the same numerical value, but
you'd never know it when you see it, because it's a lot simpler.
There are a lot of other ways we could have manipulated and
massaged the original fraction, but the steps are the same:
-- Multiply numbers with the same base, by adding the exponents.
-- Remember that a number with a negative exponent belongs
in the other section of the fraction, with a positive exponent.
