Answer:
Explanation:
The choices make the answer difficult to settle on.
First of all the meaning. If you have ever dropped a pile of dishes while working in a cafe, you know exactly what it means. It is loud, much louder than the chaos of the noise created by those in the cafe. It startles everyone in there. So it really is a surprise.
It is a bit unappealing, but that is not the fault of the question. It was intended to be unappealing. The answer is not exactly correct. The problem is the figure of speech. You have to try something else. Not D.
Go back to what happened. The noise of dishes dropping is not short. That's the true part of the figure of speech. So don't choose C.
It's not A either. Same reason its not C.
The only answer you can choose is B
Answer:
My answer is D I hope this can help u
Answer:
The Irony stems fromthe fact that Layeville had attempted the invention of a Time Travel Machine which in essence liberates man from the constant repeated continuum of having to live out his life in the presence without any ability to go back to the past or visit the future.
The time machine was meant to free man from time.
His efforts was an astronomic failure as the invention went belly up killing the countrys 30 best scientists in one go before an audience who had gathered to view the unveiling and public trial of the time travel machine.
As a punishment, the city build a life size version of the machine which contained a clock and a pendulum as a prison for him. Thus, Layeville, the scientist who sought to free himself from time became ironically but literarily trapped in a giant clock in the full glare of the city.
Cheers!
You could do cinderella goes to sneak out to the ball but her stepmother has life360 and catches her
(Assuming that the clause is <em>if the cat eats</em><u><em> its </em></u><em>food </em>and not <em>If the cat eats </em><u><em>it´s</em></u><em> food.)</em>
First of all, an independent clause is that which expresses an idea by itself. A subordinate clause is the one which depends on another, normally coupled to another by a coordinating conjunction: as,for,by, among others. In this case,we have a conjunction: IF, which in general, joins a sentence with another in which one represents a condition to the second, for example, if it does not rain,we should go swimming.
In the case of <em>if the cat eats its food, </em>we have only one subordinate clause. The reason is that it is not possible to make two sentences out of this one, so it isnot possible to say that there are two independent clauses.
There is not an independet clause only, because although there is only one clause,it is subordinate, the point is that we do not have the clause that it depends on. And so,there is only one clause,we could not say that there is a subordinate and an independent clause either, so the answer is: a subordinate clause only.
