Answer:
Whatever the African impact of the Atlantic trade, it was at its greatest in West Africa, which supplied the largest number of captives, although at the height of the trade many other parts of Africa were also used as a source for slaves. In addition, the trade had a disproportionate impact on the male population, because male slaves were the most sought after in the Americas; it is thought that roughly two-thirds of the slaves taken to the New World were male, only one-third female.
Powerful Africans who engaged in slave dealing could make a sizeable profit from the trade, especially in view of the relatively high prices that European merchants were prepared to pay for African slaves. By the eighteenth century, slaves had become Africa’s main export.
Explanation:
Answer:
The correct answer is Genrals. Sundiata of Mali put generals in charge of provinces.
Sundiata is presented as a great administrator who developed the trade, the exploitation of gold and new techniques, such as the introduction of cotton cultivation. He organized politically and administratively the subject towns, implanting a solid military organization: the heads of their armies were installed as provincial governors.
Sundiata, in addition to his warrior conquests, is known for his wisdom and tolerance, which allowed the peaceful coexistence of Islam and animism in his empire.
Explanation:
Answer:
It was not
Explanation:
The civil war still proceeded to happen over the morality and legality of slavery, so the Missouri compromise was clearly ineffective at preventing war and appeasing both sides permanently.
Answer:
Explanation:The dawn of the twentieth century found the region between Kansas and Texas in transition. Once set aside as a permanent home for indigenous and uprooted American Indians, almost two million acres of Indian Territory had been opened to settlement in 1889. Joined with a strip of land above the Texas Panhandle, the two areas were designated "Oklahoma Territory" by an act of Congress the following year. Subsequent additions of land surrendered by tribal governments increased the new territory until it was roughly equal in size to the diminished Indian Territory. Land was the universal attraction, but many white pioneers who rushed into Oklahoma Territory or settled in Indian Territory hoped for a fresh start in a new Eden not dominated by wealth and corporate power. Freedmen dreamed of a new beginning in a place of social justice where rights guaranteed by the Constitution would be respected. Most Native Americans, whose land was being occupied, had come to realize the futility of their opposition to the process that would soon unite the two territories into a single state. A few Indians, most wedded to tribal traditions, simply ignored a process they could not understand and refused to participate in an allotment of land they had once been promised would be theirs "forever."
The birth of the new state occurred in an era of protest and reform. Populist and Progressive currents merged to sweep reform-minded Democrats to an overwhelming victory in 1906 in the selection of delegates to a Constitutional Convention tasked with forging Indian and Oklahoma territories and the Osage Nation into a single state. The constitution drafted at the convention in Guthrie in 1906–07 was not as "radical" as Pres. Theodore Roosevelt suggested, but it did reflect its authors' belief that the will of the people, not powerful corporations, should determine state policy. A series of provisions, including a corporation commission, popular election of many state officials, initiative and referendum, preferential balloting for U.S. senators, a single term for the governor, a weak legislature, and inclusion of details in the constitution normally enacted by statute, reflected the founding fathers' conviction that corporate influence on state government should be held in check.
The objectives of new imperialism included accessing exchange courses and crude materials, spreading religious esteem, helping the vulnerable Africans as a piece of "The White Man's Burden", and increasing political predominance over different nations. The Europeans segmented off Africa to the diverse forces, from their the Europeans attacked the nations, colonized, subjugated the locals and constrained them to cultivate the crude products.
