Answer: no
Explanation: if the government didn't protect the peoples rights then the people can throw out the government and replace a new and better one to the peoples liking since its well known in the constitution that the people have the power to do so, like the magna carta where the government (king) at the time abused power and gave cruel and usual punishments. The government cannot go against the people or take there rights (John Locke - the social contract) its also why we have our bill of rights to secure our rights for the government does not violate us and rule of law where nobody is above the law. The government would only go to great lengths if it was a issue the people suggest they look into, other then that the government does not go to far lengths for there citizens unless they get called out for it.
This question asks for an essay, which is a personal task that we cannot provide here. However, we can still develop some ideas that might help you in your work.
The House of Representatives can be considered both the people's branch and the insiders' branch. However, there is no question that the institution is now a lot more restrictive and less connected to the people than it was when the Framers designed it. Therefore, I would argue that it has become an insiders' branch.
First, legislators do not listen to constituents all the time. This is because each legislators has an enormous amount of constituents, all of which have very different characteristics. Moreover, legislators need to reconcile the interests of their constituents with those of other groups.
Second, the policymaking process makes it difficult for the public to monitor and evaluate the House. This is because common people do not have access to the necessary information to make this possible. Moreover, the process is long and complicated, and cannot be easily understood by all people.
Finally, partisan gerrymandering and polarization means that certain groups of constituents are much more important to a politician's career and support than others. This includes constituents in swing states, or constituents who support a particular party. Therefore, these constituents might see their interests represented more often than others.
The answer is written by experts in their field of study.
Answer:
1:c 2:a 3: "in less than six years the odds have changed from 9 to 1 in our favor to 8 to 5 against us." AND "The truth of this statement is becoming terrifyingly clear as we see this country each day losing on every front"
Explanation:
I just took it y'all
Explanation:
