I believe that the answer is a county
Answer:
Modern social change protests are a group of sexist and racist individuals who claim that they want to stop those things by showing those things to the "oppressors". For example, the black lives matter movement claims that they want to end racism, but if you actually look at the fact that they intentionally harm the lives of white people and advocate for racism against white people in schools and in society. The Modern feminist movement is now sexist against men, and have pushed for fundamentally sexist rules, even when women, legally have more rights than men in America. The "Anti-Facist" or "Antifa" is a terrorist organization who's entire purpose is to cause harm to anyone with a conservative mindset; this is actually written in their own description. These are examples of "social change" protests that are intentionally cause harm, but there are ones, such as the march for life, that don't cause harm to anyone; instead, they do a lot of good things.
Explanation:
Answer:
C. Physical features or operational attributes that render an entity open to exploitation or susceptible to a given hazard.
Explanation:
Vulnerability -
Vulnerability is defined as the diminished capacity of any individual or any group to resist , anticipate , recover from the impact of man - made or natural hazards .
The concept of vulnerability is dynamic and relative .
Hence , The correct definition for Vulnerability is option ( c ) .
The answer is B. Grasslands and C. Deciduous forest. The desert only has two seasons, and the rain forest only has two seasons.
B. The decision affirmed the protection of symbolic speech.
In Schneck v. the United States (1919), the Court's resolution supported the limitation of symbolic speech in the form of anti-war brochures which inspired residents to resist the draft. In two following cases, Thornhill v. Alabama (1940) and Virginia v. Barnette (1943), the Court ordered in favor of First Amendment security for symbolic speech. By favouring the students, the Supreme Court guaranteed that the students had the right to free speech inside schools as long as it did not disturb the education process.
