Answer:
1. To appeal to other countries that might be at war or foes of the United States of America. So, the United States and the other countries are the both sides.
2. The effect of this on the audience including those on the other side would be a softened emotion that would prompt them to strive for unity.
Explanation:
President John F. Kennedy on his inaugural day delivered a lecture to the American audience which was broadcast worldwide. In the middle of the speech, he started several sentences with the phrase, "Let both sides...". By referring to both sides, he was making reference to countries that were in opposition to the United States. He implored that they seek peaceful ways to resolve their problems instead of resorting to violence and the use of arms which were negative inventions of science.
This would have appealed to the emotions of his immediate and extended audience, helping them realize that war was not the best option for them. They would also come to see civility as a better way to deal with their issues.
Answer:
They know an expert will provide the most accurate information.
Explanation:
They know an eyewitness will be free of personal bias. - This is not correct. Eyewitness reports of historical events will most likely be very much based on personal bias. Eyewitness reports will vary according to the cultural background of the person, where they were during events, their emotional state and stance towards the events, their background knowledge, their participation in the events, and many more.
They know a student who did research will be an accurate source. - This is not true. Historians can’t assume the student research will be the accurate source as students are only learning to do proper research and are expected to still make mistakes.
<u>They know an expert will provide the most accurate information. - This is the correct answer. When starting work, historians assume that experts who did research and examinations before them, and who put down information, are giving accurate accounts.</u> For example, if a historian’s work is based on the material artifact, he or she will assume that the archeologist before them made the best possible account into the explanation and background of the artifact.
They know an eyewitness report will always be truthful. - This is not true. As mentioned before, eyewitness reports are highly subjective, and therefore cannot be taken as true scientific findings.
The last one.
Create a bibliography so you can make sure you've cited sources correctly.
The correct answer is She had a lovely house, many friends, and an impressive body of work.
Answer:
<em><u>it's A</u></em> because D seems quite way too direct and not very freindly in a sense..