Answer:
The first response
Explanation:
The first response is the only claim that makes sense. To check, let's use the process of elimination.
Second: Calling the scientists' surveys unsophisticated is irrelevant and does not prove that the original claim is correct.
Third: This option does not address the points made by the counterclaim and instead pushes the original idea. It is important to remember that it is supposed to be a response, not a new statement.
Fourth: This response gives up on the original idea and ends the debate, with the counterclaim winning.
Conflict between labor unions and factory owners
Answer:
Rewrote:
1 Miffy my dog, barks loudly at everything and everyone.
2.My dog chases my cat under the dining room table.
3. My neighbor has a tiny dog who was flown in from the Midwest.
4. Miffy likes to hide under the porch steps.
5.I walk Miffy up and down the hill everyday.
6. Miffy buries her bones in my backyard.
Explanation:
I hope this makes sense, all you're doing is making the sentences less wordy and more understanding. I don't know if you're suppose to add the 'miffy my dog' to clarify miffy meant as in the dog. Hope this helps!!!
Answer: well u can try pleading them if u love it that much or, u could do soccer, baseball.
Explanation: Hope this helped, and hope that u get to do wut u love :)
Answer:
It means the moment when democracy was threatened was a terrible time, because it threatens the whole country.
Explanation:
Gorman says that we did not expect to be heirs to such a terrible time. That hour is the time when democracy and order were threatened in the country, which threatened the life and freedom of all citizens. A "terrifying hour" refers to a time that will have extremely negative results and that will accompany people for a long time.
