If he continued northwest across the Arabian Sea from Kalhat, Marco Polo would most likely describe Hormuz.
The city of Hormuz is located in current-day Iran, and it is located northwest from Kalhat - also known as Qalhat - which is located north of Sur, in Oman. This is the route that Polo took in his returning trip from China.
On the other hand, both Dhofar and Socotra are southwest from Kalhat, also in Oman. Also, while Venetia is northeast from Kalhat, it would be the last city he would have described after visiting Kalhat.
It is evident that the lion thought he would never need help from a mere mouse.
Answer:
A. She can speak Japanese.
B. Did I not see anybody in the park?
C. I have submitted my assignment.
Explanation:
When a question begins with an auxiliary verb, it can be converted into a statement by moving the auxiliary verb in front of the main verb. This is how the first question will become a statement:
- Can she speak Japanese? - She can speak Japanese.
Interrogative sentences are sentences that ask a question. The given negative sentence can be turned into an interrogative one by placing the auxiliary verb <em>did </em>at the beginning of the sentence.
- I did not see anybody in the park. - Did I not see anybody in the park?
To turn a negative sentence into an affirmative one, we need to remove the negation <em>not</em>. The adverb <em>yet </em>should be removed as well because it's not used in affirmative sentences such as this one.
- I haven't submitted my assignment yet. - I have submitted my assignment.
Answer:
This can lead to, if the other person's idea is more popular or the other person themself is, the great thinker being discredited and/or disliked. Such as if someone said a very popular food was poisonous, but someone else said it wasn't, people might believe the latter person's idea, as they don't want the other to be true possibly. It can also possibly have the reverse effect of the person with the other idea being discredited and/or disliked. If the great think is known for being a great thinker, people might then think anyone who disagrees with them must be wrong and possibly even foolish or something. It also may lead to it being harder for people to realize when the great thinker is wrong because they might have already thought of how they must be right and started thinking that the other was clearly wrong because of that, which might dissuade them from realizing they were actually wrong and that the great thinker had made the mistake. This may also apply if both are correct, but people think the great thinker is *more* correct.
Answer: Do I see that the writer tried to add style to the essay?
Do I notice that the writer tries to engage readers?
Explanation:
