<span> - Both colonies were outposts in the South Pacific, providing a presence that indicated the power and extent of the British Empire.
<span> - Both lands were to be used for their resources, with the intention of developing them into self-sufficient colonies that would also provide products for Great Britain.</span></span>
Answer:
To encourage foreign investment
Explanation:
China has had a history of human rights abuse ever since the communist party came to power in the country. The human rights abuses came in all sorts and forms, from murders, to segregation, systematic conversion and reeducation, supervision etc. This actions were of course not seen fondly by the international community, so the developing China started to curtail on the human rights abuses in order to be more acceptable, thus to be able to get more foreign investments. The tactic worked perfectly well, with foreign investments from all over the world boosting the Chinese development and economy. The dark side of it though is that China still continues to abuse the human rights, and that is actually intensifying lately, as now the country has a lot of power and has no concerns about the opinion of the international community.
Answer:
Master Theodoric
Explanation:
Master Theodoric is artist it the court of Charles IV of Bohemia whowas known for combining his preference for substantial bodies, oversized hands and heads, and dour faces with the graceful quality of French Gothic style.
Answer:
We don't really have direct democracies in most cases. If we did, the laws would be created by the people. But we do have democratic republics. The laws are created by elected representatives and then, depending on the level, signed into being by the executive, i.e. governor or President. In a monarchy you often have the monarch working with some kind of elected body these days, so that would be similar to elected representatives creating the law and then approval at the executive level. But in a true monarchy, I suppose just the monarch. The same would be the case in a dictatorship, where the executive would make the laws, often with the assistance of a closed group of powerful individuals. Frequently the military will have some involvement. In some systems, you have administrative agencies created that can then create rules which must be obeyed, though those agencies can be controlled by the other involved bodies which actually pass the laws as opposed to create rules. Example, the FTC, FDA, NLRB in the US.
Explanation:
Hope this helps, this took me awhile to type but its worth helping someone :)
The answer is true......................
