1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Olegator [25]
3 years ago
7

The Russian and Japanese war was fought over control of what nation that they both wanted imperial rights to?

History
1 answer:
Naily [24]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

In 1904, the Russian Empire, which was ruled by the autocratic Czar Nicholas II, was one of the largest territorial powers in the world.

However, with the Siberian shipping center of Vladivostok forced to close for much of the winter months, the empire was in need of a warm-water port in the Pacific Ocean, both for purposes of trade as well as a base for its growing navy.

Czar Nicholas set his sights on the Korean and Liaodong peninsulas, the latter located in present-day China. The Russian Empire already leased a port on the Liaodong Peninsula from China—Port Arthur—but it wanted to have a base of operations firmly under its control.

The Japanese, meanwhile, had been concerned about Russian influence in the region since the First Sino-Japanese War of 1895. Russia provided military support to the Qing Empire in China during that conflict, which pitted the two Asian powers against each other.

With the Russians’ history of military aggression, the Japanese initially sought a deal, offering to cede control of Manchuria (northeastern China). Under the terms of the proposal, Japan would have maintained influence over Korea.

However, Russia refused Japan’s offer and demanded that Korea north of the 39th parallel serve as a neutral zone.

As negotiations broke down, the Japanese opted to go to war, staging a surprise attack on the Russian navy at Port Arthur on February 8, 1904.

You might be interested in
"Times were really tough when I finished high school. I was determined to not stay and work on my parents' farm but college was
DIA [1.3K]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Can you please help i will give brainlest
KiRa [710]

Answer:

A

Explanation:

A talks about one war being more horrific than the other, which is up to opinion. For example, I may think World War 1 was more horrific, but you may think World War 2 was more horrific. It is an opinion.

A majority of the world's countries participating in World War 2 is a fact. 30 nations participated in World War 2, which is a fact and is not up to opinion.

Japan's surrender ending the War is a fact, the war did end when Japan surrendered, it is not an opinion.

The amount of deaths that happened in the war is a statistic, which is purely factual.

3 0
3 years ago
Why is it important for credibility that immigration statistics on the US State Department’s website are updated regularly?Which
Mice21 [21]

Answer:

i have the answer to the first question.

Explanation:

It ensures current information.

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
After overthrowing a monarch the Romans established a form of government called a republic which which of these statements descr
andre [41]

The Roman Republic (Latin: Res publica Romana; Classical Latin: [ˈreːs ˈpuːb.lɪ.ka roːˈmaː.na]) was the era of ancient Roman civilization beginning with the overthrow of the Roman Kingdom, traditionally dated to 509 BC, and ending in 27 BC with the establishment of the Roman Empire. It was during this period that Rome's control expanded from the city's immediate surroundings to hegemony over the entire Mediterranean world.

During the first two centuries of its existence, the Roman Republic expanded through a combination of conquest and alliance, from central Italy to the entire Italian peninsula. By the following century, it included North Africa, most of the Iberian Peninsula, and what is now southern France. Two centuries after that, towards the end of the 1st century BC, it included the rest of modern France, Greece, and much of the eastern Mediterranean. By this time, internal tensions led to a series of civil wars, culminating with the assassination of Julius Caesar, which led to the transition from republic to empire.

The exact date of transition can be a matter of interpretation. Historians have variously proposed Julius Caesar's crossing of the Rubicon River in 49 BC, Caesar's appointment as dictator for life in 44 BC, and the defeat of Mark Antony and Cleopatra at the Battle of Actium in 31 BC. However, most use the same date as did the ancient Romans themselves, the Roman Senate's grant of extraordinary powers to Octavian and his adopting the title Augustus in 27 BC, as the defining event ending the Republic.

Roman government was headed by two consuls, elected annually by the citizens and advised by a senate composed of appointed magistrates. As Roman society was very hierarchical by modern standards, the evolution of the Roman government was heavily influenced by the struggle between the patricians, Rome's land-holding aristocracy, who traced their ancestry to the founding of Rome, and the plebeians, the far more numerous citizen-commoners. Over time, the laws that gave patricians exclusive rights to Rome's highest offices were repealed or weakened, and leading plebeian families became full members of the aristocracy. The leaders of the Republic developed a strong tradition and morality requiring public service and patronage in peace and war, making military and political success inextricably linked. Many of Rome's legal and legislative structures (later codified into the Justinian Code, and again into the Napoleonic Code) can still be observed throughout Europe and much of the world in modern nation states and international organizations.


If This Helped Mark Me Brainlest Please!:)


5 0
3 years ago
The author of the petition would MOST LIKELY agree with what reason for resisting British mercantilist policies?
tiny-mole [99]

The author of the petition  would most likely agree with the reason that British laws are too protectionist and hurt the colonies’ ability to provide for themselves.

During the Mercantilism era, Great Britain used the colonists as their money makers. They put restrictions on how money was spent in the colonies.

They restricted them on the countries that they could trade with and the goods that could be produced in the colonies. All of these were done in order to protect their own interests.

Read more on brainly.com/question/24754459?referrer=searchResults

4 0
2 years ago
Other questions:
  • What did most anericans want during the 1950s
    5·1 answer
  • Which of the following is a duty of the president outlined in article ll of the constitution
    13·1 answer
  • If your teacher assigned you a research project on the causes of the American Revolution, which vocabulary terms would you need
    14·2 answers
  • Which of the following was a problem that many urban americans faced during the early 1900s?
    13·1 answer
  • Following World war II, Korea was divided into two nations. place each description in the correct category
    13·2 answers
  • which of the following best explains the electoral college? a group of people that decides which candidate should be elected pre
    5·2 answers
  • What happened to the town of Pompeii in 79 A.D.? A.. A devastating flood swept through the town, washing people and buildings aw
    10·2 answers
  • What was the primary reason why the 9/11 tragedy had unique relevance for Oklahomans? a More Oklahomans died in the 9/11 attacks
    9·2 answers
  • Hellow =) ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,​
    7·2 answers
  • Which country is known to help people with autism with their dolphin therapy or dolphin therapy?
    5·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!