Answer:
The correct answer is option C. It is too vague.
Explanation:
The above sentence is ineffective because it is too vague. The reason is because it states some facts that do not entail anything. It does not say anything about how and for what have this person is qualified. And secondly it fails to explain the strengths and skills he portrayed and learned through the previous job due to which he was a good worker.
Therefore option C. It is too vague is the answer.
Hello There @I5oanisDain2eQT, How are you doing?
OK, so you want the definition and the two typical definitions; based on "Websters New Dictionary" are the following:
1. <span>an exchange of diverging or opposite views, typically a heated or angry one.
2. </span><span>a reason or set of reasons given with the aim of persuading others that an action or idea is right or wrong.
In other words, it may be known as a Discussion over a topic, or even more physical like a fight. Usually an argument is seen over topics in politics and so on. I really hope i helped!
Happy Studying!</span>
The author used this to emphasize that the poem is simply a memory and is no longer in that state.
Answer:
The answer is B
Explanation:
I can't figure out how to explain this. The reasoning I used to figure it out makes sense though.
The goal of education according to the poem is to make people think independently.
Explanation:
The production of books is the primary way in which education happens in the classroom scenario.
To present the burning of the book in the poem shows the importance of books as well as the need to be self reliant.
Only the people who are self reliant in their education and do not keep relying on books, instead choosing to learn from them and then thinking independently are the ones that are responsible for the education and its success as a system.
