Answer:
A)
Explanation:
I found the rest of your question.
A. increased water scarcity B. overfishing C. decreased soil salinity D. deforestation
Overfishing, decreased soil salinity and deforestation are concerns about agricultural production and its effect but the increased water scarcity is not.
Overfishing is considering a fish species from the water and because of that population of fish is lack which is not good.
Soil salinity can stop the plant from growing and also the quality of water.
Deforestation is the removal of forests or trees and it has a big effect on agricultural production.
Answer:
By looking at the map we can infer that A) Manufacturing was a key part of the economy in the Northeast.
Explanation:
Most of the technology was brought over from England and as people started to settle they started to work with cotton and manufacturing textiles. It is true that being close to a body of water made it easier not only to transport the goods but also the machinery needed. However, Illinois and Indiana have Lake Michigan as a primary body of water. We know that textiles were a big part of the economy since very early on and so were cotton fields, were they would extract the necessary material to them manufacture the textiles needed.
It is false, because Denver is the most populated and it is in the Northern part of colorodo
Answer:
The long-term effects of the remittances will be that the European economies will lose more money and find it hard to balance their economies, while North African societies will have increased spending power.
Explanation:
Remittances are the money that is sent back to their native countries by the migrants that work in another country. Basically, what happens, is the migrants, in this case, North African ones, go to work in a European country, earn a much larger amount of money than what they were able to in their native country, and send a big portion of that money back to their families.
While the intention is good as these people just want to support their families and for them to have a better life, it is devastating for the economies of the host countries. To put it simply, the North African migrants take money out of the economy of their host country, don't spend them in that economy, but move them into the economy of their native country. This can easily rest in the economic collapse of the host countries in the long run, while the North African societies have a positive effect by experiencing increased spending power, though if the economies of the host countries crumble that will vanish over night.
