1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
romanna [79]
3 years ago
13

Why did the United States get involved in the conflicts in the Koreas and Vietnam?

History
1 answer:
Alja [10]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

Involvement was an extension of the containment policy against Communism.

Explanation:

America intended not just to restrain communism, but also to avoid a domino effect. It was concerned   that if Korea fell, Japan, which was vital to American trade, might fall into line.

<u><em>Hope this helps! Please Mark Brainliest!</em></u>

You might be interested in
Which amendment dealt with Slavery<br> plz help
amid [387]
It was the 13th Amendment
7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What were the two major cities in the Harappa society
Anna35 [415]
Mohenjo-daro and Harappa
6 0
3 years ago
What are 3 powers given to the Executive branch?<br> Sorry I'm really dumb
Softa [21]

Answer:

the legislative, executive and judicial branches

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
A democracy is a volcano which conceals the fiery materials of its own destruction. These will produce an eruption and carry des
Lostsunrise [7]

The meaning of Fisher Ames' description of democracy's liberty as licentiousness refers to <u>the potential danger that </u><u>unlimited freedom</u><u> can inflict on a democracy</u>.

Fisher Ames warned that immorality would erupt in democracy, thereby destroying its gains because of the excessive permissions.

Thus, the meaning of Fisher Ames' description of democracy's liberty as licentiousness is<u> to warn against excessive behaviors</u>.

Learn more about the characteristics of democracy here: brainly.com/question/8157957

7 0
3 years ago
Present at
Sidana [21]

Answer: it depends what you are talking about what documents are you trying to argue. But here is my shot in trying to help you make your argument clear that you are for the topic then use that information to write an argument against that topic.

Explanation: meaning if you are trying to argue let’s say the Indian removal act you would write why you are for it and then write why you are against it.

6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • How did the plebeians gain power in the republic for what changes were they responsible
    12·2 answers
  • How did the introduction of the horse to north america change the native american way of life
    10·2 answers
  • How did the Kansas-Nebraska Act attempt to resolve the issue of slavery in the territories?
    5·1 answer
  • How did californias statehood affect the U.S
    5·1 answer
  • Do you think a democracy should be totally open or can it maintain secrecy
    12·2 answers
  • To become financially responsible, you need to accept that you are accountable for your financial future.
    6·1 answer
  • What happens when the atmosphere interacts with the biosphere?
    9·1 answer
  • Which statement is true about the result of European colonialism in the Americas?
    13·1 answer
  • The last person to be elected under the 12th Amendment was ______.
    12·1 answer
  • What is your reaction to the Song "Bayan Ko"?
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!