Personal injury protection covers injury caused to any one by our mistake.Property damage on the other hand covers damage caused to someone's property.
<u>Explanation:</u>
Corporal damage security is the protection that covers injuries sustained. While resources harm accident insurance covers the damages caused to other people's property.
Personal injury protection covers injury irrespective of the fact that who made the accident. For example, If a passenger is injured by the driver in an accident then that driver can be held for the medical expenses.
Property destruction responsibility insurance covers damage to someone else's property, it does not cover damages to our own property.It includes property like house,car,office,fences,lamp post ,telephone poles.
Any type of weapon in most real cause the weapon is not on the seen nor even found sometimes.
The criminal justice data analysis tools that have been linked in the module resources.
- Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)
- National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Dashboard (N-DASH) Tool
<h3>What type(s) of crime seem to be increasing and decreasing?</h3>
The Unequal right crimes are increasing as well as hate crime while the declining rate in cracking cocaine.
Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT) is known to be used inn private facilities as well as in local jails, imprisonment rate, citizenship status, and others.
National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Dashboard (N-DASH) Tool boast the speed of carrying out analyses, has new data elements, and helps makes custom graphics and others.
Therefore, The criminal justice data analysis tools that have been linked in the module resources.
- Corrections Statistical Analysis Tool (CSAT)
- National Crime Victimization Survey (NCVS) Dashboard (N-DASH) Tool
Learn more about data analysis from
brainly.com/question/23810306
#SPJ1
Answer:
c. Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence.
Explanation:
Spencer will win because regardless of whether Glen was acting within the scope of his employment, Sally is liable for his negligence. Sally is obligated for his carelessness. Since Sally employed Glen and the obligation of any carelessness turns into Sally's inevitably.
