1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mamont248 [21]
3 years ago
8

What is the difference between justification and excuse defense

Law
2 answers:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
8 0
Justification and excuse are different defenses in a criminal case. Both defenses admit that the defendant committed an act proscribed by law. ... The proscribed act is excused if the defendant's violation was not entirely voluntary, such as if they acted under duress or under a false belief.
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The difference is that Justification is a social Defense and a Excuse Defense is a mental disorder or something physical wrong with them

Explanation:

Excuse defence is when the defendant admits to committing a criminal act but believes that he or she cannot be held responsible because there was no criminal intent. Excuse defences that are used in courts today are; Age, Mental Disorder, Automatism, Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law.

Justification is a defense in a criminal case, by which a defendant who committed the crime as defined, claims they did no wrong, because committing the crime advanced some social interest or vindicated a right of such importance that it outweighs the wrongfulness of the crime.

You might be interested in
2. How is it possible for citizens from two different countries to see the same thing and interpret it
andrew11 [14]
Previous experiences and culture are two factors that effect how an individual interprets something.
3 0
3 years ago
What is the most accurate description of the criminal justice system?
viktelen [127]
The 2nd option: “A collection of agencies...”
5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Who is all in the school build and who is virtual
AnnyKZ [126]
I’m virtual ................
5 0
3 years ago
Explain what Barnaby Jack meant when he said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution”.
Sophie [7]
Answer

When Barnaby Jack said, “Sometimes you have to demo a threat to spark a solution,” he meant that sometimes, if there isn't a problem, there would be no reason to find a solution. By demoing a threat, then there would show that there is room for a problem, meaning there needs to be a way to fix it.

Explanation

Done
6 0
3 years ago
What potential conflict of interest is presented by a lawmaker accepting an
Pavlova-9 [17]

Answer:

A term used to describe the situation in which a public official or fiduciary who, contrary to the obligation and absolute duty to act for the benefit of the public or a designated individual, exploits the relationship for personal benefit, typically pecuniary.

In certain relationships, individuals or the general public place their trust and confidence in someone to act in their best interests. When an individual has the responsibility to represent another person—whether as administrator, attorney, executor, government official, or trustee—a clash between professional obligations and personal interests arises if the individual tries to perform that duty while at the same time trying to achieve personal gain. The appearance of a conflict of interest is present if there is a potential for the personal interests of an individual to clash with fiduciary duties, such as when a client has his or her attorney commence an action against a company in which the attorney is the majority stockholder.

Incompatibility of professional duties and personal interests has led Congress and many state legislatures to enact statutes defining conduct that constitutes a conflict of interest and specifying the sanctions for violations. A member of a profession who has been involved in a conflict of interest might be subject to disciplinary proceedings before the body that granted permission to practice that profession.

5 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • A candidate for president must be
    11·1 answer
  • What is the stair tool in investigation​
    8·1 answer
  • Written by Alexander Hamilton the the merits of the Electoral College.
    9·1 answer
  • DRIVERS ED!!
    12·2 answers
  • Help for monika please
    12·2 answers
  • Why is it a good idea to physically prepare before you go into training to be a firefighter?
    11·1 answer
  • What is accuracy and provide a real-life example of law enforcement being accurate when using technical writing?
    5·1 answer
  • Which type of reaction is shown by this general equation?
    8·2 answers
  • 4. How is criminal law and civil law codified in Arizona?
    5·2 answers
  • the US presidential election is determined by the people and which of the following? A.) the senate B.) the supreme court C.) th
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!