1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Mamont248 [21]
3 years ago
8

What is the difference between justification and excuse defense

Law
2 answers:
kenny6666 [7]3 years ago
8 0
Justification and excuse are different defenses in a criminal case. Both defenses admit that the defendant committed an act proscribed by law. ... The proscribed act is excused if the defendant's violation was not entirely voluntary, such as if they acted under duress or under a false belief.
aleksandrvk [35]3 years ago
5 0

Answer:

The difference is that Justification is a social Defense and a Excuse Defense is a mental disorder or something physical wrong with them

Explanation:

Excuse defence is when the defendant admits to committing a criminal act but believes that he or she cannot be held responsible because there was no criminal intent. Excuse defences that are used in courts today are; Age, Mental Disorder, Automatism, Mistake of Fact and Mistake of Law.

Justification is a defense in a criminal case, by which a defendant who committed the crime as defined, claims they did no wrong, because committing the crime advanced some social interest or vindicated a right of such importance that it outweighs the wrongfulness of the crime.

You might be interested in
Why is the peaceful transfer of power considered to be one of the most important aspects of democracy?
blondinia [14]

Answer: Democracy allows people to choose their leaders and the leaders get the powers to run the government.

Explanation:

The peaceful transfer of power is considered important in democracy. In this the powers or leadership is smoothly handed over to the newly elected or selected members of the population. This results after the election or the during transmission of powers to different political regime.

4 0
3 years ago
When is it okay for information to be provided by a therapist?
Dafna1 [17]
When they see your struggling
6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why might some argue that prohibiting a former offender from having a driver's license can lead to secondary deviance?
Masja [62]

Answer:

А. They may have to rely on former friends for transportation, putting them back in touch with the criminal world.

Explanation:

Being a criminal isn't an individual thing, rather it is really a group situation. For many offenders, their only friends are other criminals or those more likely to commit criminal acts. Thus, having only their friends to rely on for rides (Which is what most people will do) creates a risk of secondary deviance.

3 0
2 years ago
The right to privacy is recognized in all US states but can be interpreted quite broadly. However, the courts will typically fol
Gnoma [55]

Answer:

When making PRIVACY related decisions in the courts in the US, the courts will base their decisions on the Fourteenth Amendment.

Explanation:

The Fourteenth Amendment adopted in July 9, 1868, addresses the citizenship's right and equal protection under the law and was proposed to response to issues related to former slaves after the American Civil War.

The courts mostly base their judgements on Section 1 of the Amendment which expressly stated that "All persons born or naturalized in the United States, and subject to the jurisdiction thereof, are citizens of the United States and of the State wherein they reside. No State shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunity of citizens of the United States; nor shall any State deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws".

8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Which are true of the process of a case being taken to and decided by the supreme court​
Yuri [45]

Answer:

The most common way for a case to reach the Supreme Court is on appeal from a circuit court. A party seeking to appeal a decision of a circuit court can file a petition to the Supreme Court for a writ of certiorari.

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Service Manager at Universal Containers has configured Live Agent. However, the Agents are unable to see the Live Agent foot
    7·1 answer
  • How do the protestors with the signs saying "A livable planet is an unalienable right” and "Life, liberty, property” use the Dec
    6·1 answer
  • Why is it difficult for a bill to become a law?
    11·1 answer
  • 3. What is the difference between the Speaker of the House and the president pro
    8·1 answer
  • Lam qamariah in surah al mursalat * pls i need the anwers with in 2hours
    6·1 answer
  • Impaired drivers are one of many risks drivers on the highway transportation system. List 3 ways that a driver could be potentia
    7·1 answer
  • Sayid is a corrections officer in the county jail. What might be one
    5·1 answer
  • What is the difference between law and theory?
    8·2 answers
  • What legal document do student loan borrowers sign, promising to pay back the loan?
    9·2 answers
  • What is the punishment for robbery in the state of california?
    9·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!