1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
gogolik [260]
3 years ago
6

What role do you think the United States should play in keeping the rest of our globe safe?

History
2 answers:
Rasek [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

A combination of factors has sown concern about the condition of the postwar order: China’s resurgence, destabilizing Russian conduct, the ongoing disintegration of the Middle East, and the increasingly far-reaching effects of artificial intelligence, to name a few.

Perhaps the greatest anxiety, however, stems from the evolving attitude of the order’s principal architect, the United States. Under the leadership of Donald Trump, it is questioning the net strategic benefits of its participation as never before since the conclusion of World War II.

This judgment was a central theme among participants at the annual meeting of the Trilateral Commission, held last month in Singapore.

While those attending discussed Mr. Trump himself, they largely urged the adoption of a wider aperture: the president has tapped into a series of forces that had been converging well before his victory, and that will likely endure long after his time in office has concluded.

For starters, there is an increasingly marked disconnect between the issues that concern most Americans on a day-to-day basis and the way in which the foreign policy establishment discusses America’s role in the world. Washington Post national security correspondent Greg Jaffe remarked in mid-2017 that “sustaining the US-led, rules-based international order [is] an exhortation that, at best, [is] meaningless to most Americans

mariarad [96]3 years ago
6 0

Explanation:

It should play a role of a leader for a peaceful and smooth relationship between the whole globe.

*According to me

You might be interested in
Social justice and civil rights advocates hail the Supreme Court decision in the case of Brown v. Board of Education for outlawi
Llana [10]

Answer:

D. racially-segregated public schools .

Explanation:

The landmark US Supreme Court´s sentence Brown v. Board of Education of 1954 stated that racial segregation of children in public schools was unconstitutional. It reverted the 1896 Plessy versus Ferguson decision that upheld segregated but equal public facilities as constitutional. Brown v. Board of Education gave impulse to the Civic Rights Movement.

3 0
3 years ago
What were the strengths and weaknesses of the<br> Ottoman Empire?
marshall27 [118]

Answer:

Strength-strong army, many resources

Weakness- so spread out, vulverable to collapse and defiance of figures in power

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Which statement best describes a foreign policy followed by President George Washington?
iragen [17]
George Washington took over treaty negotiations with the Creek Nation of First Nations and also took a line of neutrality in foreign affairs since he knew his country was militarily rather weak since it was a fledgling country so preferred to not make war on foreign powers.
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
By what year did the area around 140th Street and 7th Avenue become populated primarily by African Americans?
xz_007 [3.2K]

Answer:

By the 1930

Explanation:

:)

7 0
3 years ago
which statement decribes a major difference between enlightenment thinkers thomas hobbes anf John Locke
pychu [463]
Well Thomas Hobbes and John Locke had a few key beliefs that where different. One was why was Government important, Hobbes believed it was supposed to protect us from ourselves while Locke believed that they were supposed to protect our belongings. Another was who had the Sovereignty. While Locke believed that was the people, Hobbes believed it was the monarch. Another was the argument of limited government, Hobbes believed that the government should have no limits and Locke believed they should. And the last key one was that of the right of revolution, meaning if the government went out of line the people could revolt and ‘start over’, Locke believed this to be true while Hobbes did not.

The did however agree on there is no such thing as Divine Right, which is that God gives the power of the throne, and the ‘State of Nature/War’ meaning that humans can and will be naturally violently times.

I hope this helped!
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The Earth revolves around the sun in a nearly circular orbit
    9·2 answers
  • What was one reform that helped transform Turkey in the 1920s?
    15·2 answers
  • What the Supreme Court's main concern is
    6·1 answer
  • BRAINLIESTTT ASAP!!!
    7·1 answer
  • Which of the following was not true about the lower classes during the revolts of this time period?
    9·2 answers
  • What are two judicial powers that governors have
    7·1 answer
  • When is Donald Trump's Birthday?
    13·2 answers
  • The Warren Court ruled that a state law that forbid using, selling, or providing information about birth control was
    11·1 answer
  • What happens if a law is no longer considered necessary?
    8·1 answer
  • How did William deal with rebellions against him in Norman England
    14·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!