Answer:
a. The shareholders will want to tender their shares.
c. The gain will be $25.31 million – $23.44 million = $1.87 million.
Explanation:
a. The value of the firm is 1.25 million shares* 15= $18.75 million.
Increase in value, 18.75*135% = $25.31 million, so now this is the value of the firm
If 50% of the shares are bought for $18.75 Million, you will buy 0.625 million shares, so the total amount that will be paid is $11.72 million.
Now, the money against shares will be borrowed as collateral. This means that the new value of the equity will be $25.31 million – $11.72 million = 13.59 million.
1.25 million shares are there so now the price of the share will be = $10.87 million ($13.59 million/$1.25 million = $ 10.87 million).
b.The price of the shares has decreased from $13.59 to $10.87 after the tender offer, everyone will want to tender their shares for $18.75.
c. Supposing everyone tenders the shares and you will buy at $18.75 per share, you will pay $23.44 (18.75 per share *1.25 million shares) to acquire the company and it will be worth $25.31 million.
The gain will be $25.31 million – $23.44 million = $1.87 million.
Answer:
The correct answer is C. Only John's commission will be counted in the U.S.
Explanation:
When developing a job that generates income in St. Louis, it is considered that any sale you make because you are within the United States is taken into account within the GNP. For its part, the country that produced the car should consider it as GDP because it is part of the production carried out in a different jurisdiction.
Answer:
C
Explanation:
Trade off can be expressed in terms of opportunity cost.
Opportunity cost or implicit is the cost of the option forgone when one alternative is chosen over other alternatives.
Kyoko has limited time so she has to choose between three activities. If she chooses one sport, she would not be able to partake in the other activities. So, she is trading off biking or running for swimming.
Trade off occurs because resources are limited and wants are unlimited.
Answer: raise; reduce
Explanation:
A Supply shock is described as a situation where the supply of a good changes suddenly/ abruptly due to an unforeseen event.
Supply shocks can be positive but are usually negative so we will assume the supply shock is negative here.
If there is a negative supply shock, the amount of goods being produced will reduce abruptly which will force the supply curve to shift left.
It will then intercept the the demand curve at an equilibrium level that has a higher price and a lower quantity of output.
Think of it this way. Negative supply shock ⇒ less goods ⇒ scarcity ⇒ higher prices.
<span>The answer is true. The anthropologists
have main ethical obligations to the people, species, and materials they
research and to the people with whom they work. These duties can exchange the
goal of seeking new knowledge, and can lead to decisions not to start or to stop
a research project when the primary obligation conflicts with other
responsibilities, such as those unsettled to sponsors or clients.</span>
