There are a lot of differences between Sir Gawain and Beowulf.
1. Sir Gawain is a mere knight, and Beowulf is a prince.
2. Sir Gawain is from a Medieval tale, while Beowulf is from an Anglo-Saxon tale.
3. <span>Sir Gawain humbles himself down and says he's feeble minded and of the least strength between all the knights, and he strongly desires to take the Green knight's challenge to avoid risking Arthur's life and put his less valuable one at stake. Beowulf is often praised for trying to pursue his own personal goals, and his strength and greatness are admirable as well.
</span>
1. Parents
2. Clams
3. Couches
4. Caves
5. Ranches
6. Armies
7. Dresses
8. Hobbies
9. Glasses
10. Arches
11. Arrows
12. Mosses
13. Props
14. Patches
15. Mints
16. Babies
17. Engines
18. Enemies
19. Supplies
20. Mistakes
Where is the question? I don’t see it
The point of view of “A Yellow Dog?” is the perspective of the dog
<h3>What is a Point of View?</h3>
This refers to the viewpoint or perspective of a person that is used to tell a story to give readers a better understanding.
Hence, we can see that from the complete text, there is the narration of a yellow dog who recounts the feeling of emptiness and loneliness as he lives with a couple.
Read more about point of view here:
brainly.com/question/13107415
#SPJ1
Plato, the notorious greek philosopher, had a very specific way of viewing the arts and their meaning to society at the time. To Plato, art was a way of imitation because the artist copied what was infront of him it was a sort of plagerism of reality. He considered the artist's point of view limited and far from the truth, which he was obsessed in attaining.
Even though he thought that art was far from the truth, since it was only a copy of reality, he recognized art's power over human being's emotions. Both plastic arts and music were efficient tools to cause emotional reactions from the viewers, and therefore an effective way of teaching. He thought the influence art had on human emotions could be dangerous at times, that's why it should be used as a didactic instrument.
In conclusion, art was only valuable to Plato if it produced emotional outcome in the subjects exposed to it, and this influence should be used to educate the masses, not to try to represent reality since it could never be completly accurate.
