Answer:
The answer is ) Poor Huck was in the same state of wretchedness and terror, for Tom had told the whole story to the lawyer the night before the great day of the trial, and Huck was sore afraid that his share in business might leak out, yet, notwithstanding Injun Joe's flight had saved him the suffering of testifying in court.
Explanation:
I took the test and got it right.
Answer:
He is ashamed because his parents behave very selfishly with the arrival of Mr. Dussel.
Explanation:
"Diary of Anne Frank" is a play that seeks to reproduce the moments lived by Anne Frank's family while they were hiding to avoid being taken to the Nazi concentration camps. Anne Frank's family was Jewish and is hiding in a very small place together with the Van Daan family, who was also a Jewish family.
The two families live with little space and small amounts of food, however, Mr. Frank, decided to help yet another Jew to hide, Mr. Dussel. However, the Van Daan family did not like this idea and they behaved in a very bad manner when Mr. Dussel arrives in hiding. Mr and Mrs Van Daan are concerned about the amount of food now that they will have to feed one more person. This makes their son, Peter, very ashamed.
Peter is also embarrassed when everyone in hiding finds out that Mr Van Daan is stealing the food.
Answer:
follows a chronological order
Explanation:
Information in the passage <u>follows a chronological order</u>
The above is correct.
From the passage, we can see that it started from the arrival of Dan Hogan to the Grand Canyon in 1890. It then progressed to the time claimed the Orphan Mine and to the time he built the trails.
It moved to the time he sold the mine to Madeleine Jacobs in 1946. Then to the stoppage and closure of the mine in 1969.
This account supported with the years each event took place actually follows a chronological order.
Chronological order is known to be the order in which the events took place beginning from first to last.
In the very, very simplest terms, judging the validity of an argument starts centers around this process:
1) Identify the rhetoric (Lines of Argument) from the actual, formal reasons. Separate the persuasive language from the actual claims to truth and fact.
2) Analyze those reasons (claims to truth and fact) by identifying their logic (often in the Implicit Reasons) and evidence.
3) Test and evaluate the logic and evidence; identify logical errors and ask whether the evidence can and has been tested and objectively, repeatedly, factually verified.
