Answer:
San Martín's strategy to consolidate independence of Argentina was expelling Spaniards from neighboring countries.
Explanation:
Jose de San Martin was the main liberator of Argentina and the southern part of South America during the 1810s and 1820s. It was a military man born in Argentina, at that time the Viceroyalty of the Rio de la Plata colony, who had been educated in Spain and had fought for this country in the Napoleonic wars. Therefore, he was an experienced warrior who, once noted of the independence movement, decided to return to his homeland to lead the troops. His first battle was in San Lorenzo, in February 1813, followed by other iconic contests until on July 9, 1816, Argentina declared its independence from Spain.
But San Martin knew that, if they did not cooperate with neighboring countries, the Spanish would win and return to Argentine territory. For this reason, he organized the Army of the Andes to liberate Chile, which he achieved in 1818 after the Battle of Maipu.
Later, he continued with his army to the north, liberating Peru in 1821 and leaving the command of the South American independence effort to Simon Bolivar in 1822.
Answer: The schism between science and religion has been recorded in many societies.
Explanation:
The rift between science and religion is not a phenomenon that only characterizes the United States' society. It is a phenomenon that is global, and the background of this problem is the same everywhere. Religious documents offer certain data that are in total contradiction with the scientific approach and facts. Religion emphasizes certain elements without re-examining them, offers them as theses without being re-examined and analyzed, and claims universal truth. Science categorically rejects such an approach, the basic postulates of science are re-examination, research, and the search for evidence.
The same theory of the origin of man and the world in these two disciplines is the opposite. Science gives its theory, which it argues with facts and evidence, while the religious approach is different and is contrary to all the postulates of science. Religion draws its beliefs from sacred texts, while science focuses its observations on experiences. Many critics of religion point out that it is a product of ignorance and that science responds to ignorance.
A CATT !! ;)! Ignore this (8282922992292938:&:!.!.!. SamamanNanans d dbdhdisi8833 i9 929 )