1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
xxMikexx [17]
3 years ago
7

Differences between the fall of the roman empire and the han dynasty

History
1 answer:
wlad13 [49]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

The Roman empire's fall was different from the fall of the Han dynasty because, unlike in Han China, the western half of Rome had a much harder and more drastic fall than the eastern portion of Rome, also known as the Byzantine empire.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
Need help:( pleaseee 15 points!
Ivenika [448]

I also think it is the first one, but I am not entirely sure.


8 0
3 years ago
Please help urgently
Mars2501 [29]
B & D are the correct answers :-)
8 0
3 years ago
what amendment provides for a smooth transition of power to the vice president if the president dies,unable to perform his dutie
koban [17]
The twenty-fifth amendment
8 0
4 years ago
Compare and contrast the 3 European countries that colonized North America.
melamori03 [73]

The three countries that colonized North America are Spain, France, and England. Spain took the lead after Columbus's voyages, and established itself in the Caribbean and Mesoamerica (Mexico and Central America). It had a very deliberate policy of conquest, with the goal of establishing colonies and extracting natural resources (especially gold and silver). It also sought to evangelize Native American peoples as a way of legitimazing its rule. France and England had a much more hands-off approach. The French established trade colonies in Canada and along the Mississippi, and became heavily involved in the fur trade. The English did not have an "official" policy, which left colonization to private initiatives; it also became a sort of release valve for social tensions, as in the case of the Puritans and other religious minorities that abandoned England for the New World.

6 0
3 years ago
Throughout the Declaration of Independence, the authors repeat the word usurpation, which means “to seize something without righ
ratelena [41]
They chose that word because it implies that the colonies never actually belonged to the king but rather to the people. The king is a usurper, meaning that his claim over the colonies is without any right. By repeating it often it sort of becomes ingrained in the reader and the reader adopts this when analyzing and talking about the declaration and the war of independence.
3 0
4 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What is the international community's most common view on nuclear proliferation? A. The threat of global nuclear war is very hig
    11·2 answers
  • Help! pls :) asap! ❤️❤️
    11·1 answer
  • What do you think was the occasion being celebrated when Lincoln
    13·1 answer
  • To what extent was the Mexican War a “justifiable” war and not simply an excuse perpetrated upon both the American and Mexican p
    11·1 answer
  • How were the economic impacts of World War II similar in the United States<br> and the Soviet Union?
    11·1 answer
  • How did the progressives believe that the reforms they proposed to municipal government would improve society?
    14·2 answers
  • Under the U.S. Constitution, which of the following is one of the President’s military powers?
    14·2 answers
  • In Congress under the Articles of Confederation each state got... A. 3 votes. B. A number of votes based on population. C. 1 vot
    9·1 answer
  • THREE contributing factors that led to the xenophobic human rights violation​
    15·1 answer
  • In what country do the Kurds represent the largest minority group?
    7·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!