Sometimes what a person wants is not what will do the best for/benefit our society.
Do you need an example?
<span>This shows that there is a statistically significant difference between the two parties on the idea. The null hypothesis would have shown that there is no difference in the two parties. Party affiliation, then, will likely be indicative of the level of a person's support for the concept of welfare reform.</span>
Answer:
the correct answer is relative
The British had help from some Indian tribes who feared the colonists and their desire to expand westward. They also had the Loyalist groups in the colonies.
The Americans had the French AFTER Saratoga. Prior they had no help. France wanted to make sure that were going to win. They didn't want to lose to Britain again. America had to prove that they could win.
Productive resources is the answer
