2nd amendments says you have the rights to bare arms. EX. You can have a weapon and it is legal
3rd amendment says tou dont have to quarter soldier. EX. a soldier cant stay in you house if you dont want them to
7nd amendment says you have the right to a trial by jury with attorney EX. you get a trial if you did a crime and you have the opption to have a lawyer or someone to defend your case
Answer:
What is the time relationship between a President’s assumption of office and his taking the oath? Apparently, the former comes first, this answer appearing to be the assumption of the language of the clause. The Second Congress assumed that President Washington took office on March 4, 1789,1 although he did not take the oath until the following April 30.
That the oath the President is required to take might be considered to add anything to the powers of the President, because of his obligation to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution, might appear to be rather a fanciful idea. But in President Jackson’s message announcing his veto of the act renewing the Bank of the United States there is language which suggests that the President has the right to refuse to enforce both statutes and judicial decisions based on his own independent decision that they were unwarranted by the Constitution.2 The idea next turned up in a message by President Lincoln justifying his suspension of the writ of habeas corpus without obtaining congressional authorization.3 And counsel to President Johnson during his impeachment trial adverted to the theory, but only in passing.4 Beyond these isolated instances, it does not appear to be seriously contended that the oath adds anything to the President’s powers.
Topics
Elections and Voting Rights
Explanation:
Answer:
The answer should be it's population
Explanation:
Hope this helped :-)
Answer:
The African states' government betrayed their people. In order to thrive knowing that they could lose land if the British strike them, they gave their people away in return for guns and weaponry. Some states fought back and most lost. Others complied with the British orders and gave them slaves.
<span>It keeps the government from taking control of businesses and limiting their success. This is what a fascist government like Hitler did in germany. His government controlled all businesses. I think this is a vital interest that has helped this nation prosper in the past and will help far into the future.</span>