1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
erastovalidia [21]
3 years ago
11

If WW1 had not taken place , do you think the russian revolution would have happened? support your argument with facts.

History
1 answer:
trasher [3.6K]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

It could have possibly happened, but most likely not.

Explanation:

The key figure of the revolution was Vladimir Lenin who was in exile during WW1 and the Germans specifically sent him back to St. Petrograd to cause political instability and bring Russia out of the war. If WW1 did not happen then Lenin would have not gone back to Russia and the White Army also could focus on suppressing Communist uprisings. The monarchy was still very weak but would remain in power. The democratic reformers would try to change Russia through peaceful protest rather than violent uprising.

You might be interested in
In what ways, if any, did Francisco Franco appeal to the people
vodka [1.7K]
To protect spain and the people of spain from non-spain forces. Even if he was a monarchist, and ensure himself as protector 
3 0
3 years ago
Every president wants to do right-Lyndon Johnson<br>Do you agree with johnsons statement??​
viktelen [127]

This statement doesn't have a correct answer because "right" is determined of the mindset of the president and people.

5 0
3 years ago
What was one way that the United States profited from World War I?
avanturin [10]

Answer:

The answer is D. They traded war materials with allies

Since the US didn't want to get involved with the war directly in the beginning, they traded materials and resources to aid their allies.

Explanation:

6 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why did most Americans not notice the plight of rural farmers in the 1920s?
Marrrta [24]
They didn't because they weren't focused on it. It was the age of technological advancement, industry, wild parties and rich city slickers. The so called roaring twenties. Everyone was focused on factories and development that they didn't pay attention to the farmers.
8 0
3 years ago
Why did more women than men face unemployment?
Lady bird [3.3K]

Answer:

i)

Explanation:

8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • how did the fugitive slave act and the kansas nebraska act increase tendions between the north and south
    14·1 answer
  • List at least three examples of local governments.
    14·1 answer
  • Which of these best describes Oliver Cromwell?
    8·1 answer
  • Why were the first people in America called "Paleolithic"? O A) They made stone tools. B) They ate dried meat. C) They used the
    6·1 answer
  • Overall, how would you describe the war from the Patriots’ perspective?
    15·2 answers
  • Which new deal agency related most closely to what president Roosevelt
    13·1 answer
  • In the 20th century, one of the major economic problems in Italy was:​
    7·1 answer
  • An excerpt from the diary of Anne frank has been published in your history textbook . Which type of source is the excerpt?
    7·1 answer
  • What do you notice about America as an independent nation NOW as compared to the Revolution?
    7·1 answer
  • What happened in juneteenth a summary
    15·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!