Answer:
The Socialist Party was sympathetic to the rights of women.
Explanation:
Morris Hillquit was a Russian born legal practitioner who moved Into United States in late 1800s and became heavily involved in United States' politic. He was one of the co-founder of the Socialist Party of America.
During this time period, the party's main focus was to pass a legislation that guaranteed worker's right. But, as a side mission, they also known to promote women suffrage. (a movement that demanded for women's right to vote in 1920). This showed the sympathetic approach that the party take toward the rights of women.
To suggest that sex is only acceptable between consenting adults would rely on b. Kantian ethics.
<h3>What is Kantian ethics?</h3>
Kantian ethics rely on the categorical imperative of ethical universality.
The implication is that one should always respect others' humanity and only act under universal rules.
The Kantian ethics is propagated by Immanuel Kant, a German philosopher.
<h3>Answer Options:</h3>
a. Virtue ethics
b. Kantian ethics
c. Utilitarianism
d. Egoism
Thus, to suggest that sex is only acceptable between consenting adults would rely on b. Kantian ethics.
Learn more about Kantian ethics at brainly.com/question/10586443
#SPJ12
Answer:
secure attachment relationships.
Explanation:
Secure attachment relationship is a term in social psychology that describes or determines how children show some distress when their mothers leaves but are able to compose themselves knowing that their caregiver will return.
Developed by John Bowlby and Mary Ainsworth, they propounded a theory known as attachment theory which is divided into secure attachment, ambivalent attachment, avoidant attachment and disorganized attachment.
It has been suggested that infants with secure attachment feel protected by their caregivers or mothers, and they know that they can depend on them to return.
Hence, in this case, the test is designed to evaluate secure attachment relationship.
Brain drain can be described as the process in which a country loses its most educated and talented workers to other countries through migration. This trend is considered a problem, because the most highly skilled and competent individuals leave the country, and contribute their expertise to the economy of other countries. The country they leave can suffer economic hardships because those who remain don't have the 'know-how' to make a difference.
Brain drain can also be defined as the loss of the academic and technological labor force through the moving of human capital to more favorable geographic, economic, or professional environments. More often than not, the movement occurs from developing countries to developed countries or areas.
Causes of Brain Drain
There are various causes of brain drain, but they differ depending on the country that's experiencing it. The main causes include seeking employment or higher paying jobs, political instability, and to seek a better quality of life. Causes of brain drain can be categorized into push factors and pull factors.
The push factors are negative characteristics of the home country that form the impetus for intelligent people migrating from Lesser Developed Countries(LDC). In addition to unemployment and political instability, some other push factors are the absence of research facilities, employment discrimination, economic underdevelopment, lack of freedom, and poor working conditions.
Pull factors are the positive characteristics of the developed country from which the migrant would like to benefit. Higher paying jobs and a better quality of life are examples of pull factors. Other pull factors include superior economic outlook, the prestige of foreign training, relatively stable political environment, a modernized educational system to allow for superior training, intellectual freedom, and rich cultures. These lists are not complete; there may be other factors, some of which can be specific to countries or even to individuals.
I don't think it is the easiest thing in the world to do, but it is definitely not the hardest. Because if you take Donald Trump for example, or any U.S president, they may have already had money, like Trump, yet everyone is not nessisarly aware of who they are exactly, but the fact that they are or were president and people now know who they are because they have moved up in the social class, no, this doesn't happen every day, but, this is just one example. Another one would be in a case where someone won the lottery, nobody really knew who they were before they won, and now they would be moved up in the social class because of their money and fame. So yes, in a sense, social mobility is an easy thing to achieve in the US.
