<span>I had a question like this various Economics classes, as part of producer theory, trade, and overall economic growth. So I hope this translates to History as well.
The answer is C) Specialization leads to interdependence.
Why? If a country (or region, or industry) specializes in producing one thing, they will need to trade in order to get the other things they need.
A and D both go against this logic and are wrong. Specialization means picking something you are good at (producing at a lower price than others), and using all your resources for it.
B is probably wrong because it just seems silly. Not everyone will get rich. That's also part of Economics - there are ups and downs in the economy, there will always be some unemployment, etc.</span>
Answer:
they try and make friends with in a sense and see to it that they have the politician thinking to to what they want most of the time this is accomplished through the interest group funding the candidates election in part
Answer: Can't you look it up on google?
Explanation:
Answer:
Jerremy has arrived at an (incorrect) fallacious conclusion.
Explanation:
Jeremy in assuming that there is a direct correlation between the two factors: being vegetarian and going to the moon. However that is nos not true, those events have no proven direct correlation on their own, so, becoming a vegetarian will not increase the probability of him going to the moon. Even if a correlation could be proven it would be possible to assume that being an astronaut increases the chances of one being vegetarian, not the other way around.
