Answer:
The structure of the article makes the author's argument more effective because the author shares factors that drive people from behaving correctly to behave incorrectly.
Explanation:
The author's last name is always written first in a works cited entry
In the system of voluntary restriction, if one person takes more than his or her share, it will ruin the system for everyone
<h2>
Answer: The third one (Good summaries provide all the data an author uses for support.)</h2>
EXPLANATIONS:
"Good summaries include the writer's opinion on the article." This one isn't correct, because writer's opinions don't matter in summaries. That's like putting your own opinion in your own summary. It's not an important part.
"Good summaries focus on the support details from the body" Support details are for when you're writing the main idea. For summaries, you're just summarizing up what the text says, in some of your own words.
"Good summaries provide all the data an author uses for support." Yes, Summaries provide data an author used for support. Like I said earlier, summaries are the summarized version of what the text says. So basically, you don't want to add boring, un-needed data/details. Use the important data/details the author used.
"Good summaries objectively restate the thesis and crucial details." This is definitely incorrect. Theses (plural form of thesis) are statements that include your opinion. You'd most likely need to use a thesis in an argumentative essay. Also, crucial details are facts to support your thesis. You wouldn't be needing these in your summary.
