Answer:
<em>10 hours per week in 20 years, 20 hours per week in 10 years or 40 hours per week in 5 years.</em>
Explanation:
According to the author Malcolm Gladwel, with his book “Outliers. The success story ”, says that to achieve excellence, you must have an accumulation of 10,000 hours of practice, this means 10 hours per week in 20 years, 20 hours per week in 10 years or 40 hours per week in 5 years.
The author analyzes the importance of culture, family, friends, ancestors and other determining factors in the success of his projects.
Gladwell cites Mozart's example, recognized as a great genius. A composer began at age 7 and it is true that we know that some good pieces were written at the time of his adolescence. But the great symphonies were written after the age of 21, when he had already accumulated more than 10,000 hours of practice, in compositions and interpretations.
From this idea of 10,000 hours of practice, a level of knowledge acquired is possible based on a scale of magnitude of 10 hours, in an approximate way:
With 1 hour: We can know the basics.
With 10 hours: We have a broader notion of the basics.
With 100 hours: A medium level is acquired.
With 1,000 hours: It advances to be a specialist.
With 10,000 hours: One can master complications in that skill.
Answer:
b. blue ocean strategy
Explanation:
Instead of competing against rival companies in the mass-produced games market (red ocean), Adam is carving out his own market by offering the consumer a higher end product that, although is still composed of games, consists a in whole new segment with much less competition, if any (blue ocean).
Therefore, the correct answer is b. blue ocean strategy
<span>The most recent study was done on June 1, 2017, and all information is from that date. There are 673 US District court judgeships and four territorial ones. At the time of this study, there were 160 active circuit court judges and 19 vacant positions, while there were 570 district court judges and a whopping 103 vacant positions.
There are 59 female circuit court judges, 37%. Men, therefore, are in 63% of positions. Intesretingly, this number has actually improved, with only one woman serving in 1977.
Disregarding race, 75% of circuit court judges are white, 13% African American, 9% Hispanic, and only 3% Asian American. 12 courts have African American judges, nine have Hispanic, and five have Asian American. Overall, all three percentages have risen since 1977 (with some variability), but interestingly, Asian Americans have only recently begun to rise in presence., starting in about 2010.
Combining gender and race, white men make up 45.6% of all circuit court judges, while Asian American women only make up 0.6%. In all races, men overpower women in numbers by a large amount.
Looking at age, the average is 64.7 years old, with over 50% over 65 and only 2% under 45. The vast majority were appointed between 45 and 54, though many came slightly before or after.
It is worth noting that the first openly gay circuit court judge was Todd M. Hughes, appointed by Obama in 2013.
If we are considering race, Asian Americans are the lowest represented. If we are considering gender, women are less represented. Overall in race and gender, Asian American women are least represented. Looking at age, people under 40 are underrepresented. Overall, though, the least common demographic would be open members of the LGBT+ community.
As you can see, this is not a straightforward question! It is a hugely interesting topic and one I plan to explore further.</span>
Answer:
$14,343.25
Explanation:
The computation is shown below;
For the first bank
The value of investment is
= $68,000 × 8% × 8 + $68,000
= $111,520
For the second bank
= $68,000 × (1 + 0.08)^8
= $125,863.25
So, the difference in these both amount should be
= $125,863.25 - $111,520
= $14,343.25
Answer:
the price earning ratio is 8.33
Explanation:
The computation of the price earning ratio is shown below:
P/E Ratio is
= share price ÷ Earning Per share
where,
The price of a share is
= 3 × 106
= $3.18
And, the earning per share is
= $4 × (1.06) ÷ (0.15 - 1.06)
So, the price earning ratio is
= (3 × (1.06) ÷ 4(1.06)÷ (0.15 -0.06))
= 8.33
Hence, the price earning ratio is 8.33
