1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
sertanlavr [38]
3 years ago
7

What would you do if u were invisible lol, make it 10 sentences

English
2 answers:
MAXImum [283]3 years ago
6 0

Answer:

i would swim in the water and splash

Explanation:

because if im swimming and the water is randomly splashing

you wouldnt know what was happening

Aneli [31]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

What i would to do if i were invisible is take everything i wanted for free then i would obviously scare ppl then i would go to disney and ride every ride without people knowing the i would sneak out bc my mom would never let me go anywhere the i would make a yt video the i would steal a puppy then i would rest and do every thing all over again the next day.

Explanation:

yw

You might be interested in
How should the subject-verb agreement in this sentence be changed, if at all? Both the ranger and the camper sees the bear.
Musya8 [376]

The sentence should be changed as there is no subject-verb agreement. The correct form of the verb should be in plural instead of singular. So the correct sentence is “Both the ranger and the camper see the bear.”

Even though both subject nouns are singular (ranger and camper), the rule of compound subject applies here.  In this case singular nouns are united by the preposition “and” to make a plural subject. Therefore, the verb should be in the plural (see) to have subject-verb agreement.


8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
What is a potential problem in reducing the Commandments to “Four legs good, two legs bad”?
Ann [662]
Hey there!

I assume we're talking about Animal Farm.

First of all, this statement alludes to the fact that they're trying to say that animals are good, and humans are bad- because that's the main idea in most parts of the book. The animals have risen up and created their own rules for the farm in the wake of the human oppression previously not occurring and brought to life by the speech of Old Major. There are two main problems:

First of all, the whole farm runs on animals - however, pigs remain sovereign. The problem is, although most animals do have four legs, some animals, like swans, birds, and chickens, don't. That means they're left out and perhaps their contribution to the farm can be lost as a result of the fact that their physical anatomy betrays the ideals of the Commandments.

Secondly, we discussed before how this leaves out humans. However, they need humans- especially for the windmill at the beginning. If you remember, Napoleon actually had to make deals with some, and those proved to be very beneficial. This pretty much means that Napoleon is trying to dictate the beliefs of the beings he rules, but breaks and bends his own rules when he wants. After all, he became the leader after a revolution on the farm and uses his attack dogs in place of military force. Sound familiar? Napoleon represents Joseph Stalin, and most other characters represent people from history. One of the main points of this book is looking at it from another perspective. The animals mean something, it's more a book about the actions of people.

Hope this helps!


5 0
4 years ago
Dialogue between two friends regarding freedom of Kashmir
Veseljchak [2.6K]

Answer: well it is fairly simple you can create two characters and name them lets go with A and B but you can put can any name you want

Explanation: A : Have you heard what's happening in   Kashmir

 B: yes it is terrible many people are losing their lives and many children and women are getting orphaned and widowed

A: hope that UN will help ease out their pain

B: the only solution is the freedom of Kashmir but it is difficult t achieve

this a kind summary  of a dialogue you can right hope it helped

6 0
3 years ago
Give me a thesis statement in the Declaration of Independence
Ann [662]

Answer:

The thesis of the Declaration of Independence was that the colonies deserved their independence, since the right to three basic things life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness came from a power higher than man. The document makes a rational argument that people desire these three basic needs, and they believe that everyone should have these rights.

Explanation:

5 0
3 years ago
Which of the following explanations best interprets the meaning of the following sentence?
arsen [322]
I agree with the last one. 
8 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • Which of these sentences uses the passive voice?
    9·1 answer
  • What did Malcolm x and other advocates influence?
    11·1 answer
  • What happened to the sadhu in the parable of the sadhu?
    7·1 answer
  • Why did Miss Sullivan repeatedly spell "w-a-t-e-r" into Helen's hands while pouring water over them?
    8·1 answer
  • Here is the story Problem With Bullies and the Brainstorming chart can you help me.
    8·2 answers
  • How do you think your future will be impacted by going to college? How will the school you choose just a representation of what
    5·1 answer
  • 1. "A tragic hero is a great man who has a fatal flaw in his make-up, which leads to his destruction. The audience identifies wi
    9·1 answer
  • She delivers the daily paper every day.
    9·1 answer
  • Help me pleaseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee
    6·2 answers
  • Please Help This Is A Timed Quiz
    12·2 answers
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!