the answer is false not true
It all depends on one's confidence and way of expressing themselves. Personally, I would say no. After everything that's been going on in this horrid year of 2020, the BLM movement has reasons. Since society today <em>still</em> has to fight for black lives (as well as others that aren't cis, straight, white men), the Pledge of Allegince speaks lies. Many people may pledge "justice for all," but our actions speak different from our words. If you are safe and have the confidence to rebel for what is just, <em>do not stand</em>, as one with heart shall not stand for injustice.
Hope this helps!
I absolutely love writing stuff like this, and it feels good.
Answer:
<h3>The transfer of certain governmental activities to private sector and enterprise would greatly serve the needs of the citizens is believed by both the excerpts and is one of the similarities between them.</h3>
Explanation:
The transfer of certain governmental activities to private sector and enterprise would greatly serve the needs of the citizens is believed by both the excerpts and is one of the similarities between them. This can be seen in the way how Wilson supports privatized agencies that cater to external entities such as politicians. He says that non privatized government agencies “must serve goals not of the organization's own choosing” because catering to citizens can be best catered by private agencies.
Similarly, Edward supports a similar concept like Wilson when he advocates that government should "move activities to the private sector, where they can… be an organic part of society connected to the actual needs of citizens”. Through this statement, he implies that government sector does not effectively provide services to the actual needs of the citizens.
The one contradicting element between these two concepts is that Wilson talks about the transfer of governmental activities to private sector in general and mostly aims on changing the ideas of government agencies, whereas, Edwards reflects his concept in the case of U.S and other countries which have adopted privatization successfully.
They rely on me pretty much. I have an older brother so it's not that much but I do a lot for my family. I think that if they relied on me less I would never learn to be responsible for myself or anyone else.
I hope this is what you were looking for!
The age to drive should not be raised to 21. Sixteen year olds are perfectly capable of driving. They are also in high school and soon to be in college. They should be able to leave and get food as well as drive to practice if they wish to peruse sports. If you are legally mature at the age of 18. Then you should be able to drive since way before the age of 21 at least.
