Answer:
Question 1: Does an art object have to serve a function to be art?
This type of question needs an answer from the one reading the question. However, I feel that an art object doesn't have to serve a function to be art. because art should speak for itself.
Question 2: Are art objects valuable in themselves, without any functions?
Art objects need to operate in some way all art exists for a cause and these motivations make up the functions of art.
Explanation:
I hope this helps, L.E.
B is the correct answer because this company allowed illegal means in order to increase profits.
A. Moral examples are totally ignored.
C. By ignoring safety precautions, this company is not focusing in public welfare.
D. Their resolution shows that it is unlikely this company shares its profits fairly.
E. It's plainly shown that this Business doesn't employ only legal means to earn profits.
The last of a series of causes, although not necessarily the proximate cause,of an effect or result... Furthermore,the effect or result produced by the proximate cause would have occurred even if there would be a subsequent action,event or force that contributed to the eventual effect or result
