Answer:
$27,000,000
Explanation:
Cost of Goods Manufactured = Direct Material Used + Direct Labor + Manufacturing Overhead + Opening Work In Progress - Closing Work In Progress
When Direct Material Used = Beginning raw materials inventory + Raw materials purchased + Ending raw materials inventory
Direct Material Used = 300,000 + 1,060,000 - 480,000 = 880,000
Direct Material Used = $880,000
Hence, Cost of Goods Manufactured = 880,000 + 820,000 + 820,000 + 1,080,000 - 900,000
Cost of Goods Manufactured= $27,000,000
Swifty Corporation's cost of goods manufactured for the year is $27,000,000
A system demo should occur After every iteration .
<h3>When should a system demo occur?</h3>
A system demo shows the new features that the system has, as a result of the iteration that it was just put through. This is very helpful in knowing the features that you can use to make the system perform in such a way that your work will be done well.
It is therefore best that a system demo is done after every iteration has been done. This ensures that the system's features will be seen and used effectively.
Find out more on system demo at brainly.com/question/14264947
#SPJ1
After implementing a solution to a given work-related problem, the manager should EVALUATE THE OUTCOME OF THE SOLUTION.
The evaluation of the chosen solution is very important, it is needed to determine whether the solution chosen effectively take care of the problem or not. The evaluation process examines the effectiveness of the solution. <span />
Answer:
B) $15.63
Explanation:
Calculation for the no-arbitrage U.S. price of one ADR
First step is to calculate the Equivalent amount of one ADR in euro
Equivalent amount of one ADR in euro = 5 ×€5
Equivalent amount of one ADR in euro = €25
Now let calculate the Dollar value of one ADR
Dollar value of one ADR = €25* €625/1,000
Dollar value of one ADR=€15,625/1,000
Dollar value of one ADR=$15.63
Therefore the no-arbitrage U.S. price of one ADR is:$15.63
Agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
The chief executive officers of the major U.S. steel makers would most likely be prosecuted under the antitrust laws if they agreed to work together to control the price of domestic steel.
<h3>What are the objectives of antitrust law?</h3>
The Sherman Act, the nation's first antitrust statute, was enacted by Congress in 1890 as a "comprehensive charter of economic liberty designed to maintain open and unhindered competition as the rule of commerce." The antitrust laws generally prohibit unauthorized mergers and business practices, leaving it to the courts to determine which ones are prohibited based on the specific facts of each case.
From the era of horses and buggies to the modern digital era, courts have applied antitrust rules to evolving marketplaces. Nevertheless, for more than a century, the antitrust laws have had the same fundamental goal: to safeguard the competitive process for the benefit of consumers, by ensuring that there are strong incentives for businesses to operate effectively, keep prices low, and keep quality high.
<h3>The three core federal antitrust laws:</h3>
- Any "monopolization, attempted monopolization, conspiracy, or combination to monopolize" is prohibited by the Sherman Act, as is "every contract, combination, or conspiracy in restraint of trade."
- The Sherman Act has harsh penalties that can be applied. The Sherman Act is a criminal law as well, and although the majority of enforcement actions are civil, anyone or any company that violates it may face legal action from the Department of Justice.
- "Unfair techniques of competition" and "unfair or deceptive activities or practices" are prohibited by the Federal Trade Commission Act.
Learn more about antitrust laws here:
brainly.com/question/8431756
#SPJ4