Answer:
ISSUE Whether flag burning constitutes "symbolic speech" protected by the First Amendment. RULING Yes. REASONING (5-4) The majority of the Court, according to Justice William Brennan, agreed with Johnson and held that flag burning constitutes a form of "symbolic speech" that is protected by the First Amendment.
Explanation:
Texas v. Johnson, 491 U.S. 397 (1989), was a decision by the Supreme Court of the United States that invalidated prohibitions on desecrating the American flag enforced in 48 of the 50 states.
It appears that she already has anxiety so she could be at a greater risk of developing depression or other panic related disorders (e.g agoraphobia)
Could you elaborate on that sir/ma’am?
Answer:
Religion is understood to influence subjective well-being through various ways: the religious community gives people a sense of belonging and provides an important source of social support; religion gives people's lives meaning and purpose; and finally, religion encourages people to lead healthier lifestyles.
Explanation:
Answer:
Option a (unintended side-effects) is the right alternative.
Explanation:
- A cost, as well as benefit occasioned by such a production company that would not be economically accumulated rather than started receiving by this same producer, seems to be an environmental problem.
- An externality could be either favorable or unfavorable and therefore can occur whether from the development or use of a particular product. The expenses and rewards may be confidential to a person or an organization, or social, which means that society as a whole should be influenced.
Some other options are given aren't connected to the conclusions reached. So, the obvious response here is just the right one.
