Answer:
Yes you are correct on this researched it
Answer:
Explanation:
Assume the initial invest at the beginning is $100.
The investment at end of year 4 is:
100 x 1.16 x 1.11 x 1.1 x 1.1 = 155.80
a) CAGR over the 4 years = (155.8 / 100 ) ^ (1/4) = 11.72%
b) Average annual return over 4 years = (16% +11% + 10% +10%) /4 = 11.75%
c) Since the returns over the 4 year period are not much volatile, average annual return is a better measure.
If the investment's returns are independent and identically distributed, Average annual return will be the better measure because there is no correlation between returns over the years and thus there is no point to take into consideration the compounding effect by using CAGR.
Explanation:
An informational interview is a wonderful way to network and a fantastic way to learn more about a career in which you are interested in possibly pursuing. And these types of interviews don't just provide solid information to those interested in corporate careers.
If what you are interested in most is starting your own business rather than working for someone else, an informational interviews is a way to find out what it takes to be a successful entrepreneur and learn more about what running your own business entails. These types of conversations can also help you make a well-informed decision about whether running your own business fits into your vision for your life and career.
Answer:
The value of price will be exactly what demand is willing to pay, without possibility of change.
Explanation:
We call that a perfectly elastic demand. When we have that kind of price elasticity, any change in price upwards will affect the demand, making it fall to almost zero. On the opposite, if we have a change in price downwards, the demand will not increase. Bread, books, and pencils are good examples of that.
Answer:
Karl Marx
Explanation:
Karl Marx was a German economist that lived in the 19th century. His definition of capital as the most important factor of production was actually quite accurate and advanced for his time. He was the first major economist to state that capital by itself was enough to generate wealth.
He also proposed socialism as the higher stage of capitalism, which actually works in many European nations which are considered social democracies, e.g. Sweden, Norway, Denmark, Holland, Germany, etc., and at the same have the highest standards of living in the world.
Personally, I believe that his major flaw was to go a few steps further and believe in communism and that it would solve all of humanity's problems. Communism is not the same of socialism, since socialism believes in an economy under the influence of the state but also supports individual merit and private property. E.g. someone that works hard should be paid more, i.e. personal wealth is not bad. On the other hand, communism believes that the state must control the economy and that individuals should be rewarded based on their needs, not their work. It doesn't matter if you work hard or not even work at all, the state must satisfy your needs.